>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> OMG! I can't believe my eyes!
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2006-10-13 10:49:38, QVGA wrote:
K800's screen isnt anything special. It looses to D900 and QVGA screens from Nokia.
. . . No ONE beats, Samsung when it comes to LCD display (CLARITY) !
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 01:05:40
Edit :
Quote
agreed
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 01:08:02
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-14 00:56:49, sapporobaby wrote:
@mervy
My question was more along the lines of: "you know what you are getting" rather than actually questioning your photography prowess. In other threads in this forum people tend to have misconceptions about functionality verses fact. Example: the jump from 2 to 3.2 megapixel will hardly be noticeable, however, make that very same jump from 2 megapixel to say, 5 and above and you will see a marked difference. I was also trying to point out that all in one devices are crippled by virtue of their design. They are good at many things but do not excel at any one particular thing due to the compromises that are built into the design. As for the k800i, it is an okay phone/camera/media player in my opinion. I went from a w800i, to a w810i, to the k800i all in the space of 2 and a half months but in the end, I think the k800i is better. I have an M600i as well that I prefer to my k800i as the camera is not really a major attraction for me.
Hmmmmm. I get it buddy.
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 09:43:44
Edit :
Quote
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
[ This Message was edited by: schumy_f1 on 2006-10-14 09:07 ]
sry
[ This Message was edited by: schumy_f1 on 2006-10-14 09:08 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 09:54:50
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-14 09:54:50, schumy_f1 wrote:
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
Look at what?
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 09:56:54
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-14 09:54:50, schumy_f1 wrote:
I`m an ex w800/w810 user and I can say that k800`s pictures are better than w800`s
Take a look:
I dont think u have posted any links. Pls chk.
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 09:57:32
Edit :
Quote
what do you say ?
I think are quite good
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 10:13:10
Edit :
Quote
Yes Yes, they are definelty good. But do u have a w800 with u. coz i want to see the comparison of the shots taken by both at the same time.
Also i have a feeling that the k800 was defective. But to prove that i want the comparison side by side.
Thnks
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 10:15:51
Edit :
Quote
I don`t have the w800 anymore but I can say to you that if you`re interested in taking good pictures and less music you should choose k800 but if you`re interested in listening music you should pick w800/w810 because k800`s sound really SUCKS;k800`s output level is very low.For this reason I want my w810 back and I think I`ll sell my k800.It`s a pity SE made this to SE`s fans.Now you have to choose music(W) OR pictures(k-cybershot).K750 was best mutimedia phone(music AND pictures) so they should let intact that great sound from k750-same with w800/w810.
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 11:00:27
Edit :
Quote
I want the best of both worlds but not a nokia. So i guess i can get ma bro the w810 for now and wait for the next REAL successor to the k750/w800.
--
Posted: 2006-10-14 11:18:01
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
