>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Regional >
Asia Pacific
> S.E sucks! why? hmmm just read this
Bookmark topic
the newer connecting ports are much better than the previous ones.
but i sure wish
would place separate 3.5mm headphone jacks on their newer walkman-branded phones. no need for adaptors and less accidental disconnections from the port when inside my jeans pockets.
--
Posted: 2007-01-22 19:39:24
Edit :
Quote
all i can say is CHARGE to experience
--
Posted: 2007-01-23 04:42:41
Edit :
Quote
well i have been using SE fones for 3 years now...
true, the terminals suck... they collect dust and everything... and they tend to lose contact with data cable, charger, and headsets.
dumb users cry out loud about it and throw the fones away to buy the bricks instead...
smart users just clean the dust from the terminals using sandpaper and enjoy the Sony experience.
Carl Zeiss looks like a market gimmick coz N93 pics are pathetic.
--
Posted: 2007-03-16 20:39:48
Edit :
Quote
every brand has their own flaws..do you think nokia is the best??im pretty sure they have much more flaws..i have SE chargers..been using them for about 2 yrs and i hav no problem with them..depends on the user..
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 09:36:39
Edit :
Quote
hey v3xat10n,
first off, i am filipino and you're comment that most filipinos prefer NOKIA is absurd. you're going to nitpick on SE because of their low grade quality chargers? if you think that SE has low grade chargers, then what about NOKIA chargers? i guarantee you that when it comes to the functionality and overall quality of a phone, SE will always kick NOKIA's a**. do you even know what a carl zeiss lens is? look, before you open you're mouth v3xat10n, learn to make your arguments more intelligent because if you are an SE hater then i assure you, you are on the wrong thread for this.
oh by the way, in case you check the survey the market here in manila, SE is now ahead of Nokia as the phone people would like to own, already own.......
Rock on SE. Good Times!
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 10:16:32
Edit :
Quote
Once again some over-zealous SE fanatics signing up to protect SE interests. I have preferred
and
ever since my first mobile phone, but i'm seriously disappointed with SE ever since their silence about the "WalkmanŽ hissing feature".. Totally unacceptable from a so-called leading company.
Here are some facts:
1. Nokia has better charge-ports..
2. Nokia has better screens (So much better than SE)
3. Nokia has Symbian
4. Contrary to what's been said, Nokia's have very good stand-by / talk times, considering the much larger screen and superior hardware..
Nokia is better. Get over it.
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 16:48:04
Edit :
Quote
nokias charger port is more basic and robust but saying that I have never had any problems with any se charger. the main reason that my friends have complained about nokias is coz of the battery life.
battery life personally doesn't bother me as I always use my phones in car cradles that charge the phone.
also never noticed much difference between the screens on nokias or se phones, they are both better than any moto I have used. neither beats the screen on my tytn
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 17:53:00
Edit :
Quote
Hey lastikcizme
Remember that facts leave no room for possibilities. For you to state a fact that Nokia has better charge ports and a better screen is hogwash. Where did you get your facts? Who's your source? You can't prove that Nokia has better charge ports than SE. For you to simply declare that Nokia has a better screen than Ericsson, that is simply your opinion and not a fact. Maybe the reason why you like Nokia's screen much better than SE is because of the fact that maybe you lack the basic IQ to operate SE's more functional interface.
Next time you shoot from your mouth lastikcizme, try to think and ponder things over your head before posting some facts that lack merit.
Go SE. Good Times!
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 03:11:37
Edit :
Quote
Way to go, fanboy!
I'll try to reply your meaninless post as clear as a mentally-challenged jumpy fanboy such as yourself can understand. While reading my reply, you might want to get a person of average intelligence to read it with you and explain you where necessary.
I can prove you that Nokia charge ports are superior. I've never encountered anyone having problems with their nokia charge ports, whereas almost everyone complains about SE's. What kind of proof do you need? Would you like a certificate? Or a documentary?
Nokia screens are much better, both in dimensions and in resolution. Nokia's within the same price range have awesome screens compared to their SE counterparts, this is undisputable. You get 320x240 screen just recently on SE models, whereas Nokia's nowadays come with 352x416 screens, which are also bigger in size.
More functional interface? Lacking the symbian support most Nokia's possess for years now, a SE phone is not very complicated to use, is it? Don't worry, although it is challenging for you, even for people with average IQ, Nokia interface is very easy to use and flexible, thanks to it's fully integrated Symbian Operating System.
Next time you spew out nonsense about functionality, at least try to save two numbers on a contact's "mobile number" field. Nuff said.
Go enjoy SE's crippled product line, where you have to choose between Walkman (which used to include the "Walkman hissing featureŽ" by the way) w/o built in camera, or a Cam-phone with limited Music capabilities. No thanks, i deserve more in exchange of my money.
PS. No Radio on W880?? What a joke.
--
Posted: 2007-03-25 11:48:59
Edit :
Quote
yes w880 has no FM. but nokia have better jokes than SE. take the example of 6670 - have nothing spec to even mention (except symbian but it dont fall under the category of spec. and this OS not the product of nokia) , but the joke is that it comes at the same price of K750,...
is it not a better joke.?
you can find many good joke series nokia phones.
[ This Message was edited by: ajeetpv on 2007-03-25 11:53 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-25 12:46:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
