>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Serious Help Needed! Immediately! Please!
Bookmark topic
The W850 is a good phone, the reason I, personally, wouldn't buy it, is that its cam lacks autofocus.
The difference is clearly visible, when you're used to a K750i, you'll be disappointed.
As you see in my sig, I have K750, W800, W810, W900 and K800, they all have autofocus and they're older than W850. I refuse to buy a newer phone with lower cam quality.
But, as said, that's my own opinion

.
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:20:23
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-20 13:20:23, Marly wrote:
The W850 is a good phone, the reason I, personally, wouldn't buy it, is that its cam lacks autofocus.
The difference is clearly visible, when you're used to a K750i, you'll be disappointed.
As you see in my sig, I have K750, W800, W810, W900 and K800, they all have autofocus and they're older than W850. I refuse to buy a newer phone with lower cam quality.
But, as said, that's my own opinion

.
Hmm seeing the complains about the keypad and the camera complains it makes me feel not to buy w850 , but instead of it then what other mobile should i buy ?
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:30:04
Edit :
Quote
@rockerZ, I think that being a Walkman phone doesn't mean the audio quality is superior, likewise, non-Walkman phones don't necessarily have poor audio quality. I'd rather bring my mobile phone and mp3 player out than my mobile phone and a digital camera. So, go for the one with a better camera if you really have to decide between the two. I agree with Marly, I'd stick with my K750 which has a better camera than get a new model with a poorer one.
[ This Message was edited by: deluded on 2007-03-20 12:47 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:43:00
Edit :
Quote
I think the k810 is the pick of the bunch. You say beautiful, camera of 2 or more mps and a walkman player. Only the last falls off but in my opinion you can't beat the k810. Bar the video recording quality it is perfect.
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:45:00
Edit :
Quote
If you can wait for the W610, I'd say you should go for that. Like mentioned before, its a

with AF.
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:46:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-20 13:43:00, deluded wrote:
@rockerZ, I think that being a Walkman phone doesn't mean the audio quality is superior, likewise, non-Walkman phones don't necessarily have poor audio quality. I'd rather bring my mobile phone and mp3 player out than my mobile phone and a digital camera. So, go for the one with a better camera if you really have to decide between the two.
So you mean i shall go with the k800 or some other good camera set ???
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 13:47:02
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-20 13:46:39, Horonaim wrote:
If you can wait for the W610, I'd say you should go for that. Like mentioned before, its a

with AF.
I was thinking the same thing to w610 , but i have no idea when it's coming and out and what the price will be.
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 20:17:08
Edit :
Quote
it will be for sure expensive, se loves to overprise the fones at launch and than the value looses so much within 2 monthes
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 22:24:03
Edit :
Quote
@rocker - Better get the K800 or if you are opting for other brands aside from the uSUAL

. . . the N73 is a nice choice too

!
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 22:37:03
Edit :
Quote
go for k800 awsome cam and same music quality as walkman phones
--
Posted: 2007-03-20 23:02:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply