>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> Mike Tyson Vs Bruce Lee
Bookmark topic
Sorry to jack the thread, but what about Bruce Lee or Jet Li?
--
Posted: 2007-07-04 17:25:07
Edit :
Quote
--
Posted: 2007-07-04 17:46:42
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-03 16:03:51, axxxr wrote:
Don't think so Bruck lee will have him on the floor in no time...he's just too quick!
I agree.
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 00:20:00
Edit :
Quote
bruce lee would win hands down....
bruce even now would be too quick for tyson.
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 04:44:22
Edit :
Quote
finally people seeing sense! i cant believe anyone can even think for a minute tyson would have a chance. size means nothing and neither does aggression! Bruce was alot more powerful than tyson and was pure muscle and a raw fighting machine!
Basically would any boxer who only trains in boxing like tyson did stand a chance in the UFC? Because that is basically the debate! A boxer VS a mixed martial arts expert. they would stand no chance what so ever! and neither would tyson!
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 14:36:04
Edit :
Quote
@filofax: - I agree man. Bruce is thunder lighting compared to Tyson....
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 15:13:21
Edit :
Quote
i understand all the backing for Bruce Lee but i think Tyson is too aggressive for lee
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 17:56:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-07-05 17:56:51, nicv27 wrote:
i understand all the backing for Bruce Lee but i think Tyson is too aggressive for lee
Been aggressive is not an advantage! Bruce lee's aggressions was channeled in to his punches and kicks.
this is what been aggressive gets you
http://www.flicklife.com/5005[....]47c/Fastest_Knockout_Ever.html
As for strength id like to point out he could do push ups using just his thumb and index finger!
Tyson was very good as a boxer. Certainly not the best ever. And indeed his punching power was ferocious, but not the capacity of a martial arts specialist. Bruce lee could break large chucks of cement with his hands, seeming to use almost no force behind it. There's so many ways you learn to use your hands, knees, feet in lethal ways with any good training you could injury, kill, maim, paralyze your opponent with mere thrust in a vital part of someone's body.
Tyson had weaknesses like everyone else. He did not have good inside fighting hand skills, and was a bit wild with his throws. Something that could be fatal in a fight against a extremely well-trained martial artists specialist.
Bruce Lee is far more athletic, quicker hand skills, quicker feet, knows which part can injure his opponent easier, and has more stamina. I don't see Tyson lasting long.
Why you think Tyson never joined Pride, Puro, or UFC?they asked him to , but he wouldn't because he knows all he can do is box! And why you think all these boxers who do go there get they shit pushed in? They are only proficient usually in one style of fighting and it isn't diverse.
Any boxer will get killed by a a real wrestler or a martial arts specialist unless his threshold for pain is unparalled or he's learned other fighting techniques. And even then it would still be difficult.
you have one fighter who is a master is ALL aspects of fighting, including body weaknesses, pressure points, how much pressure to apply to joints, where to attack and when, balance, contortion... etc...
and then you have another fighter who knows, "go straight ahead and swing until the other guy is knocked out" ... honestly... you think ANY strategy Mike could come up with would be superior to Bruce's strategy?
one clean punch and bruce would be out, true... but do you have any comprehension how difficult it would be to land a punch like that on Bruce??
[ This Message was edited by: Adz21 on 2007-07-05 18:29 ]
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 18:52:41
Edit :
Quote
Tyson vs Lee
I bet Lee will loose one his ear
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 19:24:00
Edit :
Quote
i think tyson would just try bite anything

because he would be struggling straight away
--
Posted: 2007-07-05 19:30:53
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply