>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> The first man on earth?
Bookmark topic
HaHa, and the meek shall inherit the earth, Peter kay
, IMO this life is not a rehersal so do all you can WHILE you can, im not taking any chances on the Almighty evening up any scores after i depart, though im stuffed for all eternity if my judgements out
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 20:37:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-31 14:04:56, KingBooker5 wrote:
It dosnt matter if you believe in the old testement or not, way back, there were orginaly just 2 people, wether the names were adam and eve it dosnt matter, they had off springs, and it they all kept reproducing, all the way up to the present day.
It isnt a theory, lots of people consider it fact, you stem all humans back they must all originate from 1 man and 1 woman.
You know what that means? Every one is related in one way or another
I disagree with you kingbooker. Acording to the fist account that I have given, it is crystal clear that we can not all be related. Read through man.
_________________
Please help
me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:30 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 20:38:12
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-31 20:27:01, PeterKay wrote:
Its a good question Who came first on Earth etc, but does it really matter!!
End of the day, you eat, shit and die
If you do good you will be rewarded and if you do Bad you will get punished, thats what i believe anyways
Dont forget RE-PRODUCE
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 20:57:18
Edit :
Quote
[quote]
On 2007-08-31 20:38:12, comfort mdu wrote:
On 2007-08-31 14:04:56, KingBooker5 wrote:
It dosnt matter if you believe in the old testement or not, way back, there were orginaly just 2 people, wether the names were adam and eve it dosnt matter, they had off springs, and it they all kept reproducing, all the way up to the present day.
It isnt a theory, lots of people consider it fact, you stem all humans back they must all originate from 1 man and 1 woman.
You know what that means? Every one is related in one way or another
I disagree with you kingbooker. Acording to the fist account that I have given, it is crystal clear that we can not all be related. Read through man.
That means we are all related, if we are all ofsprings from the original humans. I dont get you. You say we are offsprings, but we aint related? It makes no sence. Your theory dosnt add up. If we are all ofsprings we must be related. There is no if or but to that
[ This Message was edited by: KingBooker5 on 2007-08-31 20:09 ]
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:06:43
Edit :
Quote
I am also quite sceptical that humans originated from primates.
In the days of the cavemen, they looked a lot like monkeys, there skelentons are also quite diffrent. About 3000 years later, there are the Egyptians. You cant evolve that quick in 3000 years.
I could be totaly wrong, unless some one could correct me
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:12:15
Edit :
Quote
It's a matter of equating the balance of probability in your own mind booker, do you go with well documented evolution, or do you accept the concept of a supreme creator?, i go with the former, because the latter leaves open too many unanswered questions.
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:19:41
Edit :
Quote
I dont know whats wrong about believing in a god and science.
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:29:57
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-31 20:57:18, Ridahz wrote:
Dont forget RE-PRODUCE
Oooops, sorry i meant "Eat, Shit, Re-produce and then Die"
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:30:35
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-08-31 21:29:57, KingBooker5 wrote:
I dont know whats wrong about believing in a god and science.
It's quite smart to bet on both runners in a two horse race booker, you can't lose
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 21:34:07
Edit :
Quote
Iam! Hehehe
This message was posted from a myV-55
--
Posted: 2007-08-31 23:49:10
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
