General discussions : Other manufacturers : Post photos taken with your i-mobile 902!
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> Post photos taken with your i-mobile 902!
Bookmark topic
Most of the photos posted here were taken indoors if not, nightscenes... the weakest point of k850 and N95. this factor only showcases it's power to kill the best cameraphones on market and this is a great slap in the face of both SE and Nokia Claiming to be the best mobile imagers on the market
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 14:48:55
Edit :
Quote
To me, the i-mobile 902 is a worthy replacement for a P&S camera.
Another camera phone producing photos of similar quality is the LG KG920 (and at least one guy at HWZ who have tried both phones says that the LG model is better), but unfortunately it's price tag is the double of the i-mobile 902's. MR called the KG920 "amazingly expensive" when they reviewed it last year. The reason for the price difference is the high-quality build with Titanium for the case, plus that the camera part twists like Nikon's old Coolpix digicams.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-19 14:18 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 15:13:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-19 15:13:08, AbuBasim wrote:
To me, the i-mobile 902 is a worthy replacement for a P&S camera.
Another camera phone producing photos of similar quality is the LG KG920 (and at least one guy at HWZ who have tried both phones says that the LG model is better), but unfortunately it's price tag is the double of the i-mobile 902's. MR called the KG920 "amazingly expensive" when they reviewed it last year. The reason for the price difference is the high-quality build with Titanium for the case, plus that the camera part twists like Nikon's old Coolpix digicams.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-19 14:18 ]
i saw KG920 sample pics already, and they are comparable to the 902s but they loose terribly when it comes to performance. and the yellow cast issue on GSMArena review...
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 15:24:42
Edit :
Quote
It just goes to show that lens size and megapixels aren't factors for ordinary cam-phone photos. it's in the sensor. S700i and i-mobile have proved this.
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 15:32:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-17 20:20:42, Shuuro wrote:
Can't refrain from posting one more pic.
I guess just like a child who discover something new. well, in my case it is i-mobile 902 & it has good cam(just cam not the phone
).
It would be nice if more people post pictures taken from their i-mobile 902 here!!!
I can't even imagine a dedicated Digicam can do that. and to think it came from a phone cam? I've always thought these kind of pics are domain of Bulky and expensive DSLRS!
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 15:36:56
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-19 10:36:11, AbuBasim wrote:
At first I thought of not posting here as I already have uploaded to the
Photos section but then I thought just to post the ones from there that sucks the least.
Day:
(
Original.)
Night:
(
Original.)
And some mixed pictures:
(
Original.)
(
Original.)
(
Original.)
(
Original.)
(
Original.)
(
Original.)
And finally, to "borrow" the idea from someone in the K850i threads
(To be honest, I touched this one up a bit, rotated, cropped, improved lightning and finally scaled down. If anyone asks for it, I will upload the original.)
And I've never thought a cam-phone could have that fast a shutter speed to capture droplets. sorry if i post a lot. i just couldn't believe what i'm seeing.
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 15:42:39
Edit :
Quote
@jemuel,
The shutter speed is actually quite slow, only 1/16 second. But the light in the room is not enough to illuminate the flight of drops so the flash helps to freeze them.
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 16:50:01
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-19 11:03:03, AbuBasim wrote:
It's a bitch trying to shoot photos of water drops without BestPic. The K850i owners definitely have an advantage there. Shame about the sensor, though. If SE had used the same sensor that Sony provided to i-mobile, I would have been camping outside the SE dealer, waiting for the phone to be released. As it stands now, I wouldn't touch the K850i with a stick!
very true...it is certainly difficult to capture that shot as opposed to k850i and importantly one needs to have lot of patience to get a right shot.
902 has great cam and speaker but it can't play quality music through earphones like SE phones do. I seriously hope that SE would use better sensor in their next phone.
[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-19 17:32 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 18:27:35
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-19 15:24:42, razec wrote:
i saw KG920 sample pics already, and they are comparable to the 902s but they loose terribly when it comes to performance. and the yellow cast issue on GSMArena review...
OCWorkbench posted a
very positive review of the KG920 and their sample shots do not show the same yellow cast. They made an interesting comparison with a
Nikon Coolpix 4300 with samples on pages
6,
7 and
8. And in the conclusion on page
9 they said that the KG920 was better than the digicam!
Apologies for wandering off-topic.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-19 18:12 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-19 19:12:03
Edit :
Quote
Few more pics
Original version:
Altered version
Original version:
Altered version
Original version:
Altered version[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-20 17:40 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-20 13:35:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
