>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Samsung
> Samsung i8510 INNOV8 *official now*
Bookmark topic
On 2008-07-12 14:10:44, QVGA wrote:
You're now crossing into the plankgatan territory.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 14:27:00
Edit :
Quote
This sounds REALLY great. All the pluses of C905 with added DivX support, 3d chip, bigger screen and, to top it all, it's a smartphone. I really see no reason to buy the C905 anymore.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 14:39:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-12 13:50:58, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-12 12:57:59, Dextrr wrote:
Nighblade:
Dude, let it be released before you comment on the "pixel density" and "bad battery". It might be a little longer and wider (due to the 2.8' screen) but it's thinner than the porky C905!!!!!!!
Well just do the math, the screen's obiously QVGA and a 2.8" diagonal would have the pixels stretched a tad too much.
As for the battery life, well, the housing is a bit too thin to contain a reasonably powerful battery (considering all the things it needs to power and all the things already in the housing). And besides, Samsung's rarely been that good with battery life.
You are wrong on so many fronts it's not even funny.
1: "the screen's obiously QVGA" --> Obviously? It doesn't say anywhere it's QVGA or VGA. Your assuming there.
2: "the housing is a bit too thin to contain a reasonably powerful battery" --> Your fat 20mm C905 has a 930 mAh while the Samsung is only 16.5mm and has a 1200 mAh.
3:"Samsung's rarely been that good with battery life." --> Any concrete proof for that?
It's ok not to like other brands and worship blindly SE but making up misleading and false facts about a handset without any substantial proofs is kinda dumb.
PS: How do you feel about SE using Samsung's cam module in their flagship phone?
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 14:43:58
Edit :
Quote
Hmmm . . . I haven't visited esato for a week or so and already a new 'king' is rumored
Can it focus while video recording? And what about wimax? Wifi is sort of outdated by now. Nevertheless a nice move from Samsung.Now lets wait for Nokia's answer - be assured,it will come before this phone hits the market
I love it - nice times we are living in. A pity SE is not up there anymore
Let's hope Plankgatan does not see the last sentence.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 16:21:15
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-12 14:43:58, Dextrr wrote:
On 2008-07-12 13:50:58, NightBlade wrote:
On 2008-07-12 12:57:59, Dextrr wrote:
Nighblade:
Dude, let it be released before you comment on the "pixel density" and "bad battery". It might be a little longer and wider (due to the 2.8' screen) but it's thinner than the porky C905!!!!!!!
Well just do the math, the screen's obiously QVGA and a 2.8" diagonal would have the pixels stretched a tad too much.
As for the battery life, well, the housing is a bit too thin to contain a reasonably powerful battery (considering all the things it needs to power and all the things already in the housing). And besides, Samsung's rarely been that good with battery life.
You are wrong on so many fronts it's not even funny.
1: "the screen's obiously QVGA" --> Obviously? It doesn't say anywhere it's QVGA or VGA. Your assuming there.
2: "the housing is a bit too thin to contain a reasonably powerful battery" --> Your fat 20mm C905 has a 930 mAh while the Samsung is only 16.5mm and has a 1200 mAh.
3:"Samsung's rarely been that good with battery life." --> Any concrete proof for that?
It's ok not to like other brands and worship blindly SE but making up misleading and false facts about a handset without any substantial proofs is kinda dumb.
PS: How do you feel about SE using Samsung's cam module in their flagship phone?
he has probably fled this thread out of embarrassment
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 16:24:38
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Well its specs are impressive, but I think the C905 looks a lot better. The C905 has a beautiful clean design, while this looks a bit cluttered. What really spoils this phone is the back. They've stamped a logo on the back for just about every feature it has, and that's ugly.
Doesn't look too bad from the front though.
It certainly beats the C905 specwise.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 16:30:57
Edit :
Quote
OMG!!! the N96 has been cloned!!! LOL!
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 16:37:03
Edit :
Quote
Is that an LED flash?
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 16:43:49
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-07-12 16:30:57, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
Well its specs are impressive, but I think the C905 looks a lot better. The C905 has a beautiful clean design, while this looks a bit cluttered. What really spoils this phone is the back. They've stamped a logo on the back for just about every feature it has, and that's ugly.
Doesn't look too bad from the front though.
It certainly beats the C905 specwise.
Mate more than C905 has xenon flash, but Samsung i8510 only LED flash !!!!
[ This Message was edited by: rustam07 on 2008-07-12 17:21 ]
[ This Message was edited by: rustam07 on 2008-07-12 17:22 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 18:20:54
Edit :
Quote
According to mobilenet it's video recording is only QVGA, but at 120fps.
--
Posted: 2008-07-12 18:35:06
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
