>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bookmark topic
On 2008-08-20 22:52:32, plankgatan wrote:
some words from Mobile review:
Well, it's not everyday I get to see something unique: an
fanboi quoting MR - in a positive way!!! (Usually poor old Eldar gets flamed so badly here at Esato that he would need to wear a fireman's gear.) I feel privileged, almost like watching the passing of Halley's comet or something...
BTW: I think that was one of the few good remarks about the C902 in MR's review.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-08-21 09:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:45:04
Edit :
Quote
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 10:52:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-21 10:52:37, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ]
you might adress people in sweden by saying mother ******, but here on Esato we keep our bloody mouths shut, so i sugges you do the same
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 11:07:41
Edit :
Quote
here's some low-light pics from the c902 & k800
c902
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/458/dsc00278dp4.jpg
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/5150/dsc00380zq4.jpg
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4844/dsc00381kf4.jpg
http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/1411/dsc00383vp3.jpg
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/9456/dsc00385jv4.jpg
k800
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00095.jpg
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00096.jpg
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]make=sony+ericsson&model=k800i
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 11:50:31
Edit :
Quote
I don't know what you guys think, but C902 takes far better pics then K850 in terms of color accuracy, and post processing. also C902 pics doesn't suffer too much from heavy purple fringing as K850 does.
the C902 first pic number1 posted shows that SE have already fixed the horrible red-to-pink issue that K850 possesses. i also see the same accuracy with G900 photos. seems like the new sony module used for C902 has better implementation than the ones found in K850's imx-020
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 11:55:31
Edit :
Quote
qvga...i just kidding man
and yes. C902 produce better low light then K800. (i like my k800/k810 pictures...but C902 is more accurate)
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 11:32 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 12:26:51
Edit :
Quote
of course we are talking about the fair situation when K800 have original camera driver. K800 with modded driver is completely different song for low light and night shots. I have no doubt that clash between modded K800 and C902 in very low light would be more painful for C902 than for K800. unfortunate we don't have opportunity to check this in identical light conditions (no user with both phones). maybe some day
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 13:02:20
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-21 10:52:37, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhh. i have critize that Sibirisk mother f""ker ONE time. (and thats about C905 sensor. etc).. he he
nothing else
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-21 09:55 ]
Zip your mouth. There may be kids on this forums.
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 13:54:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-20 23:40:23, PzK wrote:
On 2008-08-20 20:43:30, number1 wrote:
If the c902 is the phone you want then buy it, but the screen & cam quality is roughly the same quality as the k800,
ROFL, that quote made me laugh. Do you have some sort of grudge against the c902? Because I cant believe you just compared the cameras between the 2 phones.
There's nothing wrong to compare this two cameras since the threadstarter is interested in these two phones.
--
Posted: 2008-08-21 14:35:47
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-20 22:52:32, plankgatan wrote:
you guys who say C702 have better camera then C902, please explain ????? (i dont know, but (sadly) i havnt seen so many sharp C702 pictures yet)
about the screen, i can tell C902 screen is crispy and have good brightness, (its even ok in sunshine).
ALL new more expensive
phones have VERY good screens...
i doubt Sonyericsson put in a dull screen on their new flagship.
some words from Mobile review:
C902 screen in darkness
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 22:12 ]
seriously WTH is that? the first and the last column are totally not being lighted
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 10:17:27
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
