>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> C902 vs LG KF750 Secret
Bookmark topic
a real comparision between 2 cameras, should have low light, macro, night, flash, daylight (who we allready seen i guess).
(just look at this colors against secret...what more can i say..C902 color-reproduction is more realistic).)
here you have 2 flash by c902
i want to see indoor like this:
and i want low light like this:
i want to see macro like this:
i want close up like this:
i want to see cloudy like this
i want real natural colors like this:
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-19 18:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 19:27:30
Edit :
Quote
oh come on guys! we talked about this already, what's the point to repeat this silly something vs. something discussion? ... and now one more time I have to write about Plank's pictures described as 'low-light'. they are dark but not low-light. ok?
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 20:03:09
Edit :
Quote
Pics taken by these phones look quite poor to me, there both as bad as each other.
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 20:04:36
Edit :
Quote
I also want same real LOW light photos and I would also like to see the rest in their actual 5Mp resolution.
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 20:21:10
Edit :
Quote
from 1st post link...
C902 (shaked hand)
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/14b.jpg
LG (high ISO and maybe shaked hand)
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/14c.jpg
and
C902
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/15b.jpg
LG (high ISO)
http://attach.sogi.com.tw/img_park/7636/15c.jpg
too high ISO in LG shots (500, 600) while C902 is 200 only and effect is really good. for sure C902 shots are taken with 'Twilight Landscape' scene which improved a lot. question: does LG have settings dedicated to low-light/night?
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 20:51:44
Edit :
Quote
KF750 closeup with desklamp light only.
Crop from orginal image.
@Raiderski: Yes, it does have a dedicated "Night Scene" setting.
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-09-19 20:26 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 21:18:39
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-19 18:47:49, plankgatan wrote:
Perfect. you really have some need to post Secrets pics in this forum
you have more and more need than me...Secret’s pics bother you? Aiaiaiaiiii....SORRY!
On 2008-09-19 17:37:36, haki wrote:
Well, besides colorful, sunny days, there are also MANY instances of photos indoors! Here is how the "best bet" fared against the Secret just a few minutes ago. I took them leaning against a wall and this is as steady as it goes.
It's not good news for some people!
C902
KF750
C902 Crop
KF750 Crop
C902 Crop
KF750 Crop
C902 Crop
KF750 Crop
Can ANYONE detect a difficulty for the Secret to pick up yellows???
C902 Crop
KF750
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-09-19 16:56 ]
In this indoor comparison (with ARTIFICIAL light) your C902 fails? Are you eating your hands now?
From Gsmarena conclusions: “The Secret is close enough to some of the best 5 megapixel cameraphones out there”...who is blind? Them or you?
On 2008-09-19 19:06:15, plankgatan wrote:
Perfect is scared to death
Yes, to be banned like you
Now we have to wait for some more page ALWAYS with the SAME C902’s 100% crop? Scarce material? You are boring showing always the same stuff again and again.
On 2008-09-19 19:06:15, plankgatan wrote:
i havnt seen one single Secret crop with this accurate quality
It’s time for you to change your glasses...
Plank’s C902 super mega quality:
Indoor pics with artficial light?
Do you bet that these 2 pics (EVEN with worse light) looks way better in the real size than yours?
Post this real size and you’ll see:
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 21:22:19
Edit :
Quote
He does NOT post 5Mp sizes...while I do! Besides, what's the use pf posting crops if we do not know HOW MUCH OF THE AREA of the original photo has been cropped???
Here's the watch at 5Mp!
[ This Message was edited by: haki on 2008-09-19 20:56 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 21:30:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-09-19 20:03:09, Raiderski wrote:
oh come on guys! we talked about this already, what's the point to repeat this silly something vs. something discussion? ... and now one more time I have to write about Plank's pictures described as 'low-light'. they are dark but not low-light. ok?
well well. i have post many LOW light....is this low enough ??
think its sad that we dont see any low light pics by Secret..this comparision is just mediocre.....(it really shows what a weak camera Secret feature
)
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-09-19 20:59 ]
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 21:53:35
Edit :
Quote
Plankgatan, can we please have the original, in 5Mp, of the Haselblad ???
--
Posted: 2008-09-19 21:58:38
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
