>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> short comparision c902 & c905
Bookmark topic
Lights on in the home, settings on auto, c902 v c905, no flash.
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
macro
c902
macro
c905
Looking at the pictures in reduced size the c902 holds up surprisingly well, but when we get a bit bigger you can see all the noise in the c902:
As opposed to the c905:
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-12 03:56 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 04:55:33
Edit :
Quote
naveedaziz83 Posts: > 500
judging by the pics abve , c905 wins in indoor low light .... lets hope sum1 doesnt spam this thread with lots of c902 pics hehe
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 08:30:39
Edit :
Quote
wich firmware do you use on your c902.....i doubt its 002.
latest firmware on c902 is not so good, ive tried it (2 times) and went back to 002 both times........thats all.
edit.... i think c902 berry & box-pictures looks better then c905, (it have a bit higher color-saturation and little better contrast).....well, thats my opinion.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 11:51 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 12:39:45
Edit :
Quote
but the purpose of a camera is to make picture as real as posible
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 12:50:43
Edit :
Quote
so ????
are you suggestion that the berry picture with c905 looks more "alive" then c902 ??? ( i dont think that berry picture is so pale in the reality)
besides, i think c902 handle true colors very good if you look at some outdoor pictures...(it just k800 & k750 who is similar in colors there...well and c905 with proper firmware of course)..and thats my oppinion again
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 11:59 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 12:54:27
Edit :
Quote
@plankgatan-post full size comparisons or reduce c905 to 5 mp and compare.
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 13:07:05
Edit :
Quote
anyway apart from the berry shot which is hard to decide the C905 wins
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 13:13:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-11-12 04:55:33, Bialynia wrote:
Lights on in the home, settings on auto, c902 v c905, no flash.
c902
c905
c902
c905
c902
c905
macro
c902
macro
c905
Looking at the pictures in reduced size the c902 holds up surprisingly well, but when we get a bit bigger you can see all the noise in the c902:
As opposed to the c905:
[ This Message was edited by: Bialynia on 2008-11-12 03:56 ]
thank you very much for such unbaised comprasion. c905 wins easily
its a much better camera then c902, nice replacement for k750 finnaly
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-11-12 12:19 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-11-12 12:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 13:16:01
Edit :
Quote
yeh yeh. this c905 pictures knock everything back to stoneage.....they looks much better then this taken by c902
se.dude...
^^
hhmm. it dosent mather one bit my friend...as long c905 uses this firmware it WILL NOT look much better just because you go down to 5m.p.
and that i insure you....
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-11-12 12:20 ]
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 13:18:01
Edit :
Quote
plank you again live in firmware conspiracies, only thing that can change picture quality is camera driver... not firmware alone
--
Posted: 2008-11-12 13:19:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
