Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera?
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> is that possible ! C905 - what the hell is wrong with this camera?
Bookmark topic
That's why you need to use the flash.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 21:24:06
Edit :
Quote
that's way I gone sell it, and drive a letter to SE . Bloody marketing with 8.1 MP, and shitty lousy pics.
I bought this phone for capture things, not for some firmware or camdriver flash experiences.
Screw U in SE.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 21:31:59
Edit :
Quote
But not if you use the flash, as that's what it is there for....
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 22:14:01
Edit :
Quote
U don't understand
Look careful which ART photo was snap with flash. There's no such.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 22:26:59
Edit :
Quote
Show me a famous piece of Art photographed with a mobile phone camera! Most artistic photography is done with £1000 cameras with huge lenses and sensors, and sufficient light conditions.
I'm sorry, but it is yourself that doesn't quite understand, the answer has been given to you several times already. No mobile phone camera can produce zero noise artifacts without sufficient lighting. This is a really silly argument. This is not what the camera is designed for, so being annoyed about it is pointless.
My car can't do 250mph, but I'm not going to sell it because of that. If you want the right result, you need the right tool. Buy a DSLR if you want perfect photos.
If you were to say this camera is terrible because it can't produce a decent pic in daylight, you would have an argument. But to say in low light you get noise is to mearly point out the obvious.
_________________
My Flickr Pics! Check them out! They're great, honest![ This Message was edited by: MARTY MCFLY on 2008-12-28 21:57 ]
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 22:45:26
Edit :
Quote
well, honestly? it just sucks... sorry
of course we can say "it's not that bad, actually it's good" only because we like SE. it's not a good idea to waste our time for sentiments. it's only a cameraphone
power of xenon is the only and really good thing in C905. however lack of details, disgusting chroma noise and level of contrast is bottleneck. if you want good cameraphone then stay away from SE and don't be fooled by Cyber-shot label. Nikon D40 is cheaper
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-12-28 22:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 22:59:47
Edit :
Quote
Raider, I know the C905 is not the best out there. That is not the argument here. The guy is upset because he doesn't get zero noise in low light. Which just doesn't happen with a mobile phone camera.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 23:04:43
Edit :
Quote
LOOK MEN,
I HAVE MY OPINION HERE. And I'm not the only one who know these. And if U think the camera on phone can't do any of ART pics, I will demand U, I have at least hundred in my PC, just from MY K750,
Yeah so what if they have a little noise. I'm talking about noise here on phone which have to be better than my old one.
There's shittiest pics I ever seen, on mobiles since CIF cameras.
Yes, U may try to explain me, but U simply don't understand. U are not photographer maybe just documentary traveler.
And U are aggressive . I really don't mind about your minds about this.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 23:08:32
Edit :
Quote
Sorry, no one is being aggressive apart from yourself.
--
Posted: 2008-12-28 23:10:42
Edit :
Quote
Sorry, but if you think that a measly K750 produces better pics than a C905 then you're deeply mistaken.
Have you tried using twilight portrait + flash? That mode manages to capture more from the background light.
example:
I think it manages well.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-12-28 23:25 ]
--
Posted: 2008-12-29 00:14:59
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
