Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : where is sony ericsson?
Index Menu
Sign in
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > where is sony ericsson? Bookmark topic
Page <  123456>

Dups! Posts: > 500

SCREW ERICSSON! That's what the S part stands for. SE is dying a slow painful death with no prospects of turning the corner in sight. 'Insiders' or those who know somebody that knows somebody who works for SE keep preaching about SE coming good this year. Well, I've heard that last year!


The time is right for a break up and give us Ericsson on their own, this has become pathetic! While SE fans await the 'killer' phone Samsung delievers more than one. Wait for good old Nokia as well, there sure is going to be something stunning next week.


I've been trying to think of a new home for me recently as I can see SE dead in no time. If I get Ericsson back then I won't complain, in fact, I'd kill SE myself!

I am probably going to go with Android or Blackberry unless Nokia appeals to me in more than just software. Only time will tell.
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 09:39:29
Edit : Quote

3_nity Posts: 187

No other opinions about SE.. Sweet and Elegan..
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 15:43:05
Edit : Quote

Brightspark Posts: 326


On 2009-02-10 15:43:05, 3_nity wrote:
No other opinions about SE.. Sweet and Elegan..


has it already been mentioned how infamously buggy, unreliable, and poorly built they are?
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 18:50:08
Edit : Quote

echo.shane Posts: 304

I still love sony ericsson dispite the common modern technology there missing such large display, dual sim, gps, wifi b/g touch display and the other stuffs. But eithe i would be able to afford now cuz im out of a job
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 20:26:14
Edit : Quote

sale987 Posts: 372




has it already been mentioned how infamously buggy, unreliable, and poorly built they are?


Guess what, you' re wrong
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 20:46:25
Edit : Quote

Brightspark Posts: 326


On 2009-02-10 20:46:25, sale987 wrote:


Guess what, you' re wrong

the returns rates say otherwise.

[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2009-02-10 22:08 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 23:07:36
Edit : Quote

masseur Posts: > 500

I've often heard about return rates, though most seem to be anecdotal

where are such return rates officially documented?
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 23:21:16
Edit : Quote

Bhavv Posts: > 500

are just ridiculous now!

How are they meant to compete with Nokia, Samsung and LG, all of who have vastly superior AND better looking products?

18 months ago I were a die hard fan, now I am begining to dislike their products as much as apple. Oh wait, sorry, Apple at least have the best screen and UI on the market. What do have?

Well, lets give them an award for multiple releases of the same under specified phone again and again for several years with just a casing change.

SE used to be No.2 after Nokia for both features and sales. Now they are behind Nokia, Samsung, and just how the heck did LG even manage to take over, not just with extremely better looking phones, but now in both specification and innovation as well???

Can someone explain to me just what are trying to do?

Samsung already have the amazing Pixon and Omnia, and they have 3 top quality handsets being announced at MWC, Nokia have the amazing N97, which along with the N85 and 5800 music have to be the first Nokia phones that I greatly admire. Then LG have the Secret, Renoir, and the upcoming KM900 arena which has amazing features at less then 12 mm thick, and an impressive 800x480 pixel 3" display.

And give up C901, C903 and some lame walkman phone.

I am no longer a fan boy for because they no longer offer me quality products.

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2009-02-10 22:47 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 23:32:35
Edit : Quote

Brightspark Posts: 326


On 2009-02-10 23:21:16, masseur wrote:
I've often heard about return rates, though most seem to be anecdotal


where are such return rates officially documented?


i suppose some could be anecdotal, such as what the occasional chat with testers, repair technicians, and retailers say.
and i suppose what people say on forums about the significant(compared to others) problems found in SE phones over the years could also be anecdotal. in addition, the fact that very few people(i can think of 1 out of many over the years) who have owned SEs that have anything good to say about their 'reliability', but is very much the reverse (anecdotal? nope. none of them have any reason to lie).
and then we read articles such as this:
http://www.mobiletoday.co.uk/news.aspx?id=43454


the trend of SEs long lasting and relatively significant problems with reliability is blatantly obvious.




[ This Message was edited by: Brightspark on 2009-02-11 01:44 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 02:25:41
Edit : Quote

Bhavv Posts: > 500

If I have had two seperate K850s break within the last 18 months, then they arent reliable anymore for me.

I dont believe anyones lies about phones being reliable and robust anymore, heck, the paint has already started to peel off my T700 D Pad. Just what kind of clever person designs phone buttons with paint that peels off with normal use? They are clever enough to use scratch resistant screens, so why cant the buttons also be scratch resistant?

[ This Message was edited by: Bhavv on 2009-02-11 03:55 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 04:50:45
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456>
New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home