Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is Bookmark topic
Page <  12345>

RockHell Posts: 105

Nice work man
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:07:32
Edit : Quote

Idou Posts: 24


On 2009-04-26 12:21:17, nikolat wrote:
Mizzle says they both suck, and everyone gets offended.


I'm very offended!! Ow, i think i'm going to cry because Mizzle said C902 and Ixus suck.


--
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:15:29
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500


On 2009-04-26 16:13:07, plankgatan wrote:
we develop 503CW films (straight ahead) quite often, and they are amazing, just amazing



That comes from a guy who says the C902 camera is great. Excellent reference, you've got there!
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 17:51:33
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500

thought it would be unnecessary to start a new thread...
anyway here some comparision by my c902 and Olympus FE280 8m.p.
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902. iso-64. macro (EV 0.0)
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

olympus. iso-50. macro
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

c902. iso-64. macro (EV 0.0)
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic

olumpys. iso-50. macro
ImageandvideohostingbyTinyPic
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-26 20:41 ]

--
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:38:05
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500

That's as useless as your praising words. Full size, please.
--
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:39:57
Edit : Quote

blerk Posts: > 500

@plankatan
Looks like the lens on the Olymus has grease on it or something. Looks to smudged out or maybe you shake too much


Off topic:

On 2009-04-26 11:59:52, gtr83 wrote:
@blerk
So, are you already using an N95 8GB now?

Yep see here: http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/index.php?uid=155655
N95 with 8GB microSD I prefer expandable memory over build-in, soon 16 and 32GB won't be that costly and I can just upgrade the memory. The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn
[ This Message was edited by: blerk on 2009-04-26 23:38 ]

--
Posted: 2009-04-27 00:34:30
Edit : Quote

plankgatan Posts: > 500


On 2009-04-25 19:39:06, QVGA wrote:
The pics they produce at 100% crops are just hopeless. So in low light you have an 'utterly hopeless' phone camera and a 'just hopeless' digital camera. I would not want either of those.



wouldn't want either of those ??? well, you already own a 'utterly hopeless' phone camera, (Samsung i450 is hardly some great shooter)...
that's self-irony in the big league.


besides, think ixus-85 looks good in full size for its size

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-04-27 10:18 ]

--
Posted: 2009-04-27 10:57:30
Edit : Quote

number1 Posts: > 500

I wouldn't want either aswell, especialy the digicam at that price

http://www.trustedreviews.com[....]02/Canon-Digital-IXUS-85-IS/p1

Average compact cam pic quality, barrel distortion & purple fringing , limited dynamic range , i'd be pretty upset if i've paid over 100GBP for it.
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 11:59:02
Edit : Quote

davidtre Posts: 14


On 2009-04-26 09:34:23, Mizzle wrote:

On 2009-04-26 03:01:26, davidtre wrote:

On 2009-04-25 23:54:11, Mizzle wrote:
that doesn't mean that there are other and better options available.


That is to say that the same reasoning can be valid with your “professional equipment”


Obviously that should have said "that there aren't".


Do you have something like this?

http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 15:35:05
Edit : Quote

Mizzle Posts: > 500

Of course.
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 15:59:45
Edit : Quote
Page <  12345>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home