Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Android : Sony Xperia S thread
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Android > Sony Xperia S thread Bookmark topic
Page <  123, 45 ... 207208209>

Bonovox Posts: > 500

But why is internal memory gonna be the future?? Where is the logic?? The cards are so small now you can fit them into any device,you can easily move memory about and never lose it if the phone fails. You can upgrade it further but if it is gonna be the future they need to start thinking about higher than 32 gigs.
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 15:03:00
Edit : Quote

mode Posts: > 500

I swear if they give us anymore of pea-sized internal memory phones like Arc S that's slows down to an unbelievably pathetic crawl after merely 70-80 apps due to low internal memory I'm gonna make it my personal vendetta to advice everyone I know against Sony phones. I'm tired of their nonsense, as if having a good sized internal space is some crazy far-fetched idea
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 15:27:04
Edit : Quote

doministry Posts: > 500


On 2012-01-10 15:27:04, mode wrote:
I swear if they give us anymore of pea-sized internal memory phones like Arc S that's slows down to an unbelievably pathetic crawl after merely 70-80 apps due to low internal memory I'm gonna make it my personal vendetta to advice everyone I know against Sony phones. I'm tired of their nonsense, as if having a good sized internal space is some crazy far-fetched idea


Well if the memory is non removable the whole memory management will probably look like on WP7 and iOS - everything will be available for apps. You will not worry about it....

The question is rather what about the USB support.
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 16:12:56
Edit : Quote

motvikt Posts: > 500

I wonder what they did with all the extra space they got in xperia S compared to arc. Xperia S is a pretty big phone, pretty fat too . I thought non-removable battery and micro-sim would make it smaller. The battery isnt that much bigger either
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 16:27:30
Edit : Quote

adsada Posts: > 500


On 2012-01-10 14:03:26, goldenface wrote:

On 2012-01-10 13:39:22, adsada wrote:
Also with this name I can just imagine the pain of searching anywhere whether it be ebay, google or youtube the words 'sony xperia s' and getting a whole load of results on the xperia arc s! It was the same when trying to look for the xperia mini pro and continually finding the x10 mini pro...



The way to do that is to use the search term: "sony xperia s -arc" and it will not bring up anything with the word 'arc' in the title.

Simples!
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2012-01-10 13:04 ]



Ahh! I feel stupid for not realising that, but thank you this will bring great easy to me
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 16:39:24
Edit : Quote

moogoo Posts: > 500

wow.. i wake up to all these complaints about embedded battery and non-expandable memory...

my thoughts are embedded battery is no big deal. there are other ways to hard reset if necessary. as far as non-expandable memory is concerned, i would have preferred to have the ability to purchase my own microSD and choose my size, but eh, it's no big deal. 32GB is plenty for me.. that on top of cloud storage (I use google music exclusively for music on the go and dropbox, box, picasa for other files and photos) i don't see the real need to have more than 32GB. Perhaps if you're carrying more than 32GB of data on your phone at any point in time, you need to be more organized with your files? heh.. i kid.

In regards to the comments that the Xperia S isn't that thin... I think it's perfect thickness. It seems slightly thinner than the X10 from the photos and that's fine by me. I think it'd be easier to handle/hold than a razor thin phone. In addition, I'd rather have a uniform thickness than a thin phone with a bulge at the camera.

Reasons I think it's not super thin:
- 12mp camera (they have to fit all that goodness in there somehow)
- large battery (yes it's embedded but it's a larger capacity. 1750mah battery in a phone roughly the same size as the x10)
- other doodads and thinamajiggers they needed to fit in there
- overall design philosophy

BTW... other than Rog, has anyone heard or read that the xperia S will have magnesium body? from the pics, the black one seems to have a matte back. Haven't seen much of the white ...
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 16:49:44
Edit : Quote

Arne Anka Posts: > 500


On 2012-01-10 16:27:30, motvikt wrote:
I wonder what they did with all the extra space they got in xperia S compared to arc. Xperia S is a pretty big phone, pretty fat too . I thought non-removable battery and micro-sim would make it smaller. The battery isnt that much bigger either


Fat ? It's already 10.6 mm thick for god sake. How thin do you want it ?


On 2012-01-10 16:27:30, motvikt wrote:
The battery isnt that much bigger either


Maybe not mAh wise, but what has that to do with the physical size of the battery ?
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 17:04:28
Edit : Quote

Bonovox Posts: > 500

I got no issue with the battery thing but I do with no micro SD
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 17:08:25
Edit : Quote

moogoo Posts: > 500

no 2 hour 1080p video recording sessions for bonovox
--
Posted: 2012-01-10 17:10:07
Edit : Quote

Bonovox Posts: > 500

I hope the video recording becomes as good as the recent crop of Sony cameras on the market. They are really good but they better make the camera good!! Shame cos I think the design of the Ion is nicer than the Xperia S. Strange thing is the US version gets SD slot but not this one
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-01-10 16:35 ]

--
Posted: 2012-01-10 17:17:55
Edit : Quote
Page <  123, 45 ... 207208209>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home