>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia 808 PureView Thread And Discussion
Bookmark topic
Only One Question Hangs In The Air...
Which Mobile Phone From Sony Ericsson ???
Which Mobile Phone From Sony ???
Which Mobile Phone From Samsung ???
Managed To Overcome The Photographic Quality Obtained All Compact Digital Cameras Dedicated ???
What Mobile Phone Sony Or Samsung Could Compete On Equal Terms With DSLR Cameras ???
P.S: With The Answer... The Sony And Samsung Fans Of Duty !!!
NOKIA 808 PUREVIEW (__ABYSS__) ALL THE OTHER PLANET MOBILE WITH INTEGRATED DIGITAL CAMERA !!!
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 23:28:27
Edit :
Quote
Londoner?? I'm fecking Irish
--
Posted: 2012-06-18 23:50:00
Edit :
Quote
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Seems Like The Sony Fans Of Duty... The Samsung Fans On Duty And Never Will They Not Managed to Answer My Questions Above !
P.S: For Here I Close My Participation In This Topic, Discuss Photography And Technology For Whom We Do Not Understand Absolutely Nothing Of Affairs, Lost Grace !!!
PEACE AND HUGS !!! 
--
Posted: 2012-06-19 04:47:19
Edit :
Quote
We don't understand what you're trying to say.
--
Posted: 2012-06-19 17:00:05
Edit :
Quote
One More Proof Of Unquestionable Superiority Of The Nokia 808 PureView Before The All Smartphones And Digital Compact Cameras !!!
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]eview_low_light-review-775.php
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 01:00:09
Edit :
Quote
Okay, since you're on the roll here.
What other things the PV808 can actually do besides taking magnificent photos? Aside from the usual call and text? Is there anything "revo" with Belle?
Please...amuse me.
[ This Message was edited by: titus1 on 2012-06-22 02:22 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 03:11:47
Edit :
Quote
Someone needs to move this topic to Nokia threads. Why is it in Samsung??
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 03:47:00
Edit :
Quote
Unquestionable Superiority? I can only see one thing it is good at, to take pictures at good lighting. It only proves what I said before that DSLRs and CSCs with all their capabilities and quality are never threatened in the eyes of a true photographer. and Fanboys like you can enjoy trolling sites like this to spread your sacred word but with all honesty I would never ever ditch these babies
for a PureView 808
PS: someone needs to either close this thread or move it to its proper place
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2012-06-22 08:06 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 09:05:11
Edit :
Quote
I've always been a die hard Ericsson/ SE/ Sony fan and this is in the wrong thread but what Guarulhos has brought up is true. Pureview 808 is not a gimmick unlike Exmor R for mobile by Sony. It is quite an impressive innovation and we should give it credit for that. And I do believe Sony doesn't currently qualify to be in this test. However, I chose SGS3 and IP4S everytime. 808 doesn't quite cut in in terms of detail for me at 8mp. Would be different if it was at full res for sure, and there were no other tests ie. macro, low light so I'd say it's pretty much inconclusive with the advantage looking to be for 808
[ This Message was edited by: mode on 2012-06-22 23:40 ]
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 14:50:09
Edit :
Quote
I agree with you on that. Phone cameras will never be as good as a DSLR or Compact System Cameras but can rival a point and shoot. Anyone who says a phone camera is as good as a DSLR should have gone to Spec Savers. One of the best compact cameras I have seen was the Canon S95. When I used to have my £400 Samsung EX1 it had an ultra bright 1.8f lens and there is no way any phone could beat it on night shots. Phone cameras cannot do the proper long exposures either.
--
Posted: 2012-06-22 14:50:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
