>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> 7250 vs T610
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2003-05-02 17:26, mag86 wrote:
A friend of mine just got a 7250. I told him to wait for the t610 but he will only buy nokia. I got a god look at the phone, and it really disappoint me. Sure, it got 5mb, but when you can't use picture phonebook or send pictures to your friends with IR, then you really don't need 5mb. I am going to buy a t610 as soon as its on the market, and I would choose it over the 7250 even if they had the same price.
If you got a 7250 you DO need 5 MB memory, why?
BECAUSE! if you cant send your files via MMS of Irda, you'll have to wait for a solution, and knowing Nokia, you'll have to wait a while, but you still want to make Photo's so you store them
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 19:48:00
Edit :
Quote
SE need to build a mermory-stick reader 4 his phones. (compatible with T610, T310, T68i, ...) I use my MCA-20 as wallpaper-saver sometimes. You can store a lot of wallpapers that way for your T68i. It is still a litle bit faster and cheaper then storing them on a wap site lik esato
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 19:51:00
Edit :
Quote
@MeSang
Very god point.
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 19:55:00
Edit :
Quote
Picture this, you're about to get a new laptop. Now, you have set yourself up on two different ones, it's going to be one of them.
Both are about the same price. The main diff is that one has a 15" 32bit screen, 10GB harddisk and 256MB RAM, the other one has a 14" 24bit screen, 30GB harddisk and 512MB RAM, now which one is it gonna be?
Edit:
I do believe that Nokia's pc-suite works for transfering photos back and forth between your phone and pc.
[ This Message was edited by: Froddan on 2003-05-02 19:06 ]
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:01:00
Edit :
Quote
i also was like , Shit only 2 mb. But after really good thinkin i found it enough. Ill explain why.
1. Lets say you keep 1 Mb for foto`s. Thats high quality pictures of 20Kb. 1 Mb = 50 times 20 kb. So 50 pictures. Man please how many fotos do you want to save in youre Phone. Because most fotos are being put on the Pc and then deleted of the phone. so are y`all with me: 50 foto`s is enough.
2. then you have still 1 mb free. Lets say that the Se has his own programs that take .5 mb. Because you also put names in the phone book Etc. So that leaves .5 mb over. I realy dont know how much a mophun game takes. But lets say like 50 kb. Thats fair i think. Wel that are 10 games. And i dont think that anybody will put 10 games on it. because you normally have 4 or 5 games. so in my opinion. 2 mb isnt much but Enough. So all the advantages are way bigger then this minor of the T610.
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:10:00
Edit :
Quote
Seth
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:26:00
Edit :
Quote
@XsuwailX: Wala kang alam!
Nokia is not "forward-thinking". Nokia is an IMITATOR, not an INNOVATOR. They are REMOVING connectivity options from their phones instead of adding them. You think Nokia has "mastered" on-screen display? Hell no! Pictures taken from a 7650 loog great on screen, but they look LOUSY when on the PC. In other words, the 7650 fooled you.
The T610 has a very, very nice screen that displays pictures correctly. So does the P800.
You obviously don't know what you are talking about.
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:28:00
Edit :
Quote
Conclusion is T610 lack of the sexy curve 7250 have and 7250 lack of the functionality T610 have! It's a matter of whether you prefer look nor brain!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:30:00
Edit :
Quote
@vampyriaerotica: That's always the issue, isn't it?
SE: functionality (hence the choice of business-users)
Nokia: Looks (hence the choice of fashion-victims)
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 20:57:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2003-05-02 20:30, vampyriaerotica wrote:
Conclusion is T610 lack of the sexy curve 7250 have and 7250 lack of the functionality T610 have! It's a matter of whether you prefer look nor brain!
Oh man ! "the sexy curve 7250 have", Pfffffff
the "curve" of 7250 is more like a shaver than anything..
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 21:19:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
