>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> SE Vs Samsung
Bookmark topic
We are different in taste. Think aslong sy doesnt use an se, visit esato etc hard to understand our passion.
This message was posted from a T630
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 15:59:34
Edit :
Quote
Lol so whats the most expensive Samsung about then? The E700 is about 250GBP on all PAYG tariffs here I really am shocked cos it really outta be 100 less, nice housing but crap menus!
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 16:03:20
Edit :
Quote
One thing i have to admit is that samsung screens are good.
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 16:12:20
Edit :
Quote
their screen n ringtones are great but others.......
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 16:33:12
Edit :
Quote
@miss uk - I think D-410 is more expensive. Or D-710...
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 17:14:00
Edit :
Quote
@atlis D-710 is better
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 18:19:03
Edit :
Quote
How much is expensive? The D410 is free on contract :-)
This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 20:26:41
Edit :
Quote
How is the samsung support? Pix, apps, games etc?
This message was posted from a T630
--
Posted: 2004-07-21 20:35:19
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2004-07-21 00:29:29, Apoc wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-07-21 00:12:11, sylvester wrote:
Quote:
On 2004-07-18 19:58:20, Jowi wrote:
samsungs are expensive for their features
that's true...good looking phones but no BT with locked irda ...no way ...i'm with SE!
waddya mean with "locked irda" ? o.O
try to send a photo from a samsung e700 to a t610 for example and you will understand what i mean....
--
Posted: 2004-07-22 08:02:08
Edit :
Quote
I heard that some samsungs support only .jad and not .jar ,is that true?
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2004-07-22 08:15:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
