>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Information >
Esato News Articles
> Samsung Galaxy S4 announced
Bookmark topic
Hi randomuser, I know you were in a crazy rush to post rubbish about Samsung the moment you found these but it would be nice to have an actual link to where those benchmarks come from and when they were done? They are nowhere near consistant with other benchmarks done of the Exynos Octa version.
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:04:36
Edit :
Quote
Then post the benchmarks where it performs better ?
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:22:33
Edit :
Quote
Oh it does get so boring after a while when you realise arguing about which phone is better or faster is a waste of time and energy. We Windows phone 8 users are so content and happy:-) Have a nice day
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:40:00
Edit :
Quote
I had already posted these but anyway, guess it was just convenient for you to try ignore them eh?
Samsung Galaxy S4 with Exynos 5 Octa benchmarks outscore every Android out there
http://www.phonearena.com/new[....]y-Android-out-there_id41292#4-
http://www.gsmarena.com/galax[....]s_top_the_charts-news-5769.php
And the ownage continues with the latest benchmarking app, GS4 owning every other Android including the "also ran" Z:
Basemark X 1.0 test launches on Android: Galaxy S4 ranks on top
http://www.phonearena.com/new[....]Galaxy-S4-ranks-on-top_id41718
So it's not just AnTuTu and Geekbench
quit trying to make it seem as if that Z is in the same league
Anandtech still have to post the final benchmarks of the Exynos version it seems, the S600 GS4 was already beaten by the Octa in most benchmarks, so if the Exynos 5 Octa is "crap" then the S600 and the rest of the other SoCs must pure shit I guess.
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:47:31
Edit :
Quote
The main point of octa core was for battery saving. If it can give out better battery performance under similar usage as compared to s600, then I guess its a win? I am no longer focused on benchmarks as I used to be earlier.
@Tsepz_gp,
The link is here
http://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/misc/Samsung_Galaxy_S4-rev.html
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:48:14
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-10 14:40:00, Bonovox wrote:
Oh it does get so boring after a while when you realise arguing about which phone is better or faster is a waste of time and energy. We Windows phone 8 users are so content and happy:-) Have a nice day
That's because every generation of WP phones uses the same SoC.
There would be no point at all in comparing them, the Ativ S, Lumia 920 and Htc 8X use the same Snapdragon S4 if I'm not mistaken, it's one of my many reasons for not liking WP, only Qualcomm make their SoCs, there is no competition whatsoever between SoC manufacturers there, Qualcomm has a monopoly in WP.
[ This Message was edited by: Tsepz_GP on 2013-04-10 13:55 ]
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 14:51:43
Edit :
Quote
And it continues to get better:
Exynos-based Samsung Galaxy S4 benchmarks surface, head and shoulders above Snapdragon competition
By now you probably already know that the Samsung Galaxy S4 comes in two versions.
The first one will ship in the United States and most of the Western world equipped with a Snapdragon 600 quad-core chip. There is also another one for most of Asia and the rest of the world featuring Samsung’s own Exynos 5 Octa chip.
SamMobile has now done the inside digging to find out that right now there are 3 Galaxy S4 models:
GT-I9500 – Exynos 5 Octa 1.6 GHz without LTE
GT-I9505 – Snapdragon 600 1.9 GHz with LTE
SHV-E300S – Exynos 5 Octa 1.8 GHz with LTE
What is particularly interesting though is that for the first time we are getting to see the Exynos 5 Octa-based Galaxy S4 benchmarked and the results are much higher than what the Snapdragon 600 S4 yields.
A GT-I9500 Galaxy S4 with Exynos 5 Octa scores 28 018 points on popular synthetic benchmark AnTuTu, while Snapdragon 600 GT-I9505 model gets varying results but definitely lower in the vicinity of 23 to 25 000.
What’s even more exciting is that the Korean version should be the first phone to score over 30 000 points and become the world’s most powerful smartphone. This of course won't make much of a difference in daily use for most users, but Korean nerds will definitely have the most to brag about.
http://www.phonearena.com/new[....]Snapdragon-competition_id41729
*Noitce how I post links to my claims Mr.randomuser.
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 15:01:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-04-10 14:48:14, djin wrote:
The main point of octa core was for battery saving. If it can give out better battery performance under similar usage as compared to s600, then I guess its a win? I am no longer focused on benchmarks as I used to be earlier.
@Tsepz_gp,
The link is here
http://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/misc/Samsung_Galaxy_S4-rev.html
Exactly, people do seem to miss this, the A7 cores are there for power saving while the A15 cores are there for heavier tasks.
Thanks for the link btw
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 15:46:58
Edit :
Quote
Did you even read my post? Why are you posting antutu benchmark results all the time ? I've seen those and those are not different than what I posted.
Where are better results in Quadrant, Epic Citadel, Vellamo, 3D Mark benchmark etc???????????
So your claim is also crap like Octa marketing as you can't accept the truth and nor do you have proof to prove those scores wrong.
I posted already in my post that Antutu scores are better than S600 but rest are worse.
You were bragging so much how Exynos always beats Qualcomm chips extracting "best" performance. Where is the proof now to back up your tall claims ?
Except Antutu and 1 or 2 other silly benchmarks, S600 outperforms the OCTA chip easily.
Worse performance with ZERO developer support. Indeed the best performance
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-04-10 15:06 ]
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 16:04:10
Edit :
Quote
Well,competition doesn't matter to me
it all does the same thing in the end
--
Posted: 2013-04-10 17:00:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
