Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3558/comparation1nf6.jpg
and here is macro on with 3.1 made it now
... here it's raining
http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/8391/dsc01888ca0.jpg (full size)
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 17:42:04
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:28:43, dinho666 wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 16:07:20, Andeo wrote:
Recruit, some information for you:
$c0
01 id number for size 100 x 60 -- don't used
$c0
02 id number for size 160 x 120 -- used
$c0
03 id number for size 320 x 240 -- don't used
$c0
04 id number for size 640 x 480 -- used
$c0
05 id number for size 1280x 960 -- don't used
$c0
06 id number for size 1600x1200 -- don't used
$c0
07 id number for size 1632x1088 -- don't used
$c0
08 id number for size 1632x1224 -- used
hi brother...
using this codes, we can manage the others resolutions enabled in the phone??? or trade, for example, the 160x120 for the 320x240 res? how to set the others enabled??
Other sizes can be added only from main file of firmware.
But we are working on it now.
[ This Message was edited by: Andeo on 2006-10-02 16:44 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 17:43:18
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 17:55:59
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:07:07, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 16:48:12, gxg wrote:
Andeo.. can you increase the sharpnes in that driver? I think sharp is very strong in the centre of picture, but it's decreasing on extremity's.
Using macro mode.
myth falling appart!
Andeo.. please teach me how to take pictures with macro mode to a landscape or to a view like this:
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 18:13:49
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:55:59, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
ok look here ! i make original how you whant
...just i see that in e man driver is more more ....sharpeness softer pictures!
3.1 cam driver
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/6514/31ra8.jpg
5.5a cam driver
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7075/55ayo2.jpg
again 3.1
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/6707/311ez6.jpg
and 5.5a
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/9495/55aavy9.jpg
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 18:14:20
Edit :
Quote
Andeo.
Don't want to offend you.. but.. in last driver there is some choke... because of Iso.. most likely...
if you'll try 2.72 camdriver made by aksay, you'll notice that outside take an example: seaside or mountain landscape.. you don't need to use macro mode to take a good sharp, clear picture.
maybe TOGHETHER we can improve some things. For example night mode & macro - erezan, outside-day pictures - akshay and you for the colors and bugs in the programing language.
What do you say?
for begining i propose 2.72 without spot from akshay or 3.1 latest from erezan.
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 18:29:33
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 18:14:20, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:55:59, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
ok look here ! i make original how you whant
...just i see that in e man driver is more more ....sharpeness softer pictures!
You used 5.5
a.
I attached 5.5
U versions with exposure corrections some posts ago.
Can you test last version, for example - 5.5
UA
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 18:32:44
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 18:32:44, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 18:14:20, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:55:59, Andeo wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 17:42:04, ToryXX wrote:
here is the comparation between 3.1 and 5.5a !
[ This Message was edited by: ToryXX on 2006-10-02 16:43 ]
Can you take more snapshots and place original files in arhives?
For me, please.
ok look here ! i make original how you whant
...just i see that in e man driver is more more ....sharpeness softer pictures!
You used 5.5
a.
I attached 5.5
U versions with exposure corrections some posts ago.
Can you test last version, for example - 5.5
UA
well i used one with 5.5a and your last 5.5au or ua...and i used one 3.1 the first and 3.1 from today
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 19:02:24
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 16:07:20, Andeo wrote:
Recruit, some information for you:
$c0
01 id number for size 100 x 60 -- don't used
$c0
02 id number for size 160 x 120 -- used
$c0
03 id number for size 320 x 240 -- don't used
$c0
04 id number for size 640 x 480 -- used
$c0
05 id number for size 1280x 960 -- don't used
$c0
06 id number for size 1600x1200 -- don't used
$c0
07 id number for size 1632x1088 -- don't used
$c0
08 id number for size 1632x1224 -- used
Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions?
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 20:00:05
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 20:00:05, Recruit wrote:
Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions?
I'll try to do something tomorrow
--
Posted: 2006-10-02 20:47:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
