Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Index Menu
Sign in
> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic
Page <  123 ... 315316317 ... 462463464>

bbjuju Posts: 81

@rockygali,

Well, I tried to block everything except the frong flash light. It didn't work. The flash still refused to flash except in VERY dark (almost complete dark) condition. I start to suspect there's something wrong with my MXE-60.
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 04:44:33
Edit : Quote

rockygali Posts: > 500

hhmmm, then there must be sumthin there that the MXE would use to distinguish lighting conditions.

how bout the others? any personal investigation goin?
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 04:49:04
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2006-10-03 01:35:53, Jemp wrote:
The only problem is that I've tested diferent scenes whith te dieferent ddrivers, but they had very general defects, for example, 5.3 had the problem that took photos with a marker color of the main light, so no real colors reached.... 9.9 was very fast to focus, but... it's focus was a bit imprecise..., 2.441: I didn't like it's night mode and the sharpness was not enough for me, then all erzan's drivers had too the problem of sharpness.... Y tested an edited 5.3 driver which was the best, but...... crashes a lot, it sent me to de main menu when I tried to take a photo...

But there's something courious... I have seen very good photos with 5.3 driver, but only from K750 phones (I use a W800i) I think it's because of the combination FW - Camera Driver...

Y hope find some better driver for mi R1BD001 firmware in my W800i, for now using the original 4.5 Driver which handles the light very well, it only delays a bit to focus a macro, but focuses very good!

Hmm, I'll test some more, but still not sure of sharpness problem with 2.441. I'm doing some comparisons with 2.441 and 5.5ua, and wouild like to include original 4.5 driver.

Like you I find no serious misgivings with the standard driver, but of the modded drivers so far I've felt 2.441 to be the best overall. It's also better colour I feel than original, but I'm still looking into sharpness.

I'll be interested to see what 5.5 is like.
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 05:03:32
Edit : Quote

aabg Posts: 206

i think i stay with 5.5ub, very good night pictures normal, and macro mode.
i will test it with sunlight tomorrow
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 05:21:08
Edit : Quote

max_wedge Posts: > 500

Here are two samples of the W810 R4CE012 driver:


(this one I used -2EV to enhance the silhouette and reduce noise, since it was shady and late in the afternoon)


(this one I used -2EV, on normal exposure the image was washed out.)



--
Posted: 2006-10-03 05:33:45
Edit : Quote

Jemp Posts: 39

I just wanna show the diferences between a original camdriver and a tuned camdriver...

Both photos are in macro mode, led ON

4.5 Original



2.441 ( the best I have seen till now on hybrid drivers...)


The original has more JPEG compression but still mantains a great quality, but still can be better it's just to try making a good hybrid camdriver...

PD: Notice that sharpness is the same un both, but it's only in macromode, when taking photos from the distance the diference is so clear, I hope I could post something to compare, but the work does not give me time to try on sunlight....

_________________
ˇˇHeavy Metal!!

[ This Message was edited by: Jemp on 2006-10-03 04:54 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Jemp on 2006-10-03 05:00 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 05:50:16
Edit : Quote

e_erzan Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2006-10-02 23:02:29, ToryXX wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 22:57:49, macgywer wrote:
i've been on vication for a week and took the 3.1 with me. i took around 200 pics. the camera crashed once or twice but i think that's ok for that amount of shots.


http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/3184/upload1oo4.jpg


http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9521/upload2wx1.jpg


http://img445.imageshack.us/img445/2750/upload3cb9.jpg


http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/1406/upload4ej4.jpg


http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/8554/upload5od5.jpg
feedback on the pics?

great work e man! can't wait to test the latest version of 3.1



waaaaaaaaaaa,this is super ,really great ...because of this i love also 3.1 from e man....and i still don't know why eman changed the ,,seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 0A 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END; (by russian man),, with the old setting was also ok...like in this picture the macro is great!


Its the expoxure property setting that is changed...
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 05:59:45
Edit : Quote

firewired Posts: 85

Great pictures using the 3.1 version.

People, do you always turn on the macro mode?
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 08:03:16
Edit : Quote

Andeo Posts: 52

Quote:
On 2006-10-02 20:00:05, Recruit wrote:
Quote:
On 2006-10-02 16:07:20, Andeo wrote:
Recruit, some information for you:

$c0 01 id number for size 100 x 60 -- don't used
$c0 02 id number for size 160 x 120 -- used
$c0 03 id number for size 320 x 240 -- don't used
$c0 04 id number for size 640 x 480 -- used
$c0 05 id number for size 1280x 960 -- don't used
$c0 06 id number for size 1600x1200 -- don't used
$c0 07 id number for size 1632x1088 -- don't used
$c0 08 id number for size 1632x1224 -- used


Thank you very much. I wanted to ask about this:-) Another question about camdriver: Is it possible to force MXE-60 to flash even in good light conditions?

Recruit, try it...

http://rapidshare.de/files/35307052/test2_camdriver0.zip.html
http://www.filefactory.com/file/93bf31/

[ This Message was edited by: Andeo on 2006-10-03 07:25 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 08:11:15
Edit : Quote

Recruit Posts: 34

Will try as soon as possible. School sucks:-(
--
Posted: 2006-10-03 08:25:03
Edit : Quote
Page <  123 ... 315316317 ... 462463464>
New Topic   Topic Locked
Forum Index

Esato home