Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750
Bookmark topic
i already did a comparisson between version 2.1 and 2.2, and 2.2 sucks, the pics get blurred, the best driver of all is the 2.4, it has no noise at all
--
Posted: 2006-07-15 19:54:32
Edit :
Quote
@jleosza
i agree with you... hybrid 2.4 is the best since it produces less noise than the others
try it peeps and see for yourself.
thanks!
--
Posted: 2006-07-15 20:20:53
Edit :
Quote
Just installed 2.4 - did some preliminary tests - colour good, noise good, but it's nighttime now - will test again in the morning
--
Posted: 2006-07-15 20:23:45
Edit :
Quote
@ Max,
Quote:
Sorry,my bad Didn't mean to infer anything at all, it just occured to me that how would they know? I forgot that of course they would be able to look at the phone's insides - I was getting mixed up with thinking it was a completely dead motherboard, in which case they wouldn't have known.
That's okay, no probs dude...........the only sorrow I'm feeling now is having to live without my most beloved possession. I got a Panasonic GD92 as a standby till the fone is back, time to browse to some panasonic forums now
Anyway, back to the topic, looking fwd to some tests from ur side. And also try to get some night time snaps in the following way:
1> Without nightmode, without flash
2> With nightmode, without flash,
3> With night mode, with flash.
so that we can compare the noise levels in darkness :cheers:
--
Posted: 2006-07-15 20:48:48
Edit :
Quote
where to put this driver file???? and can anyone suggest the best one so....i have downloadd the 2.5 versioon....can anyone say wht the hell this driver would do..
--
Posted: 2006-07-15 21:26:32
Edit :
Quote
has anyone confimed that the white lines noise is hardware related? i hope somebody can upload some comparison pics.
--
Posted: 2006-07-16 02:29:06
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-15 21:26:32, naveensiva wrote:
where to put this driver file???? and can anyone suggest the best one so....i have downloadd the 2.5 versioon....can anyone say wht the hell this driver would do..
Please go back to the start of the thread and read, since all your questions are answered in previous posts.
I'm not meaning to be unhelpful, but if you read the thread like everyone else you would
1. become quite informed about this topic,
2. Have answers to all your questions above, all of which have been asked several time before.
3. Not be taking up people's time or forum space.
_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750
K750 Tricks[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2006-07-16 02:17 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-16 02:53:28
Edit :
Quote
I tested the 2.4 vs the 4.5 R1BC modified and the conclusion I came to was that the 2.4 snap pictures faster, the result is better sharpness because it minimizes the chance of your hand / object moving causing blurryness. The 2.4 also does not suffer from the over-exposure of the 2.1 which caused the sky to wash out in out door photos. The 2.4 however generally produced a colder picture. The modified 4.5's had warmer colours that were generally more vibrant. This only downside to the 2.4 is nothing that some photoshop cannot fix and I'm only being pickey by pointing this out. I did not notice any decrease in overall noise like some people pointed, in fact I found that the modified 4.5 driver had a little bit less noise then the 2.4 but the result was to inconsistent to make a firm determination. It appeared that noise patterns in pictures changed from shot to shot even in the same position and lighting.
IMO, I think aksd has reached the limit with these 2.4 and appauld him on his efforts. This driver is as close to perfect as I believe we are going to get at this point I believe our hardware is the limiting factor. The 2.4 will stay in my camera for now.
--
Posted: 2006-07-16 04:37:37
Edit :
Quote
@Naveen,
WTF is version 2.5???????????? The latest is 2.4!
[ This Message was edited by: IRFCA_WDG-3A on 2006-07-16 05:29 ]
--
Posted: 2006-07-16 06:27:26
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-07-16 04:37:37, brian2k1 wrote:
I tested the 2.4 vs the 4.5 R1BC modified and the conclusion I came to was that the 2.4 snap pictures faster, the result is better sharpness because it minimizes the chance of your hand / object moving causing blurryness. The 2.4 also does not suffer from the over-exposure of the 2.1 which caused the sky to wash out in out door photos. The 2.4 however generally produced a colder picture. The modified 4.5's had warmer colours that were generally more vibrant. This only downside to the 2.4 is nothing that some photoshop cannot fix and I'm only being pickey by pointing this out. I did not notice any decrease in overall noise like some people pointed, in fact I found that the modified 4.5 driver had a little bit less noise then the 2.4 but the result was to inconsistent to make a firm determination. It appeared that noise patterns in pictures changed from shot to shot even in the same position and lighting.
IMO, I think aksd has reached the limit with these 2.4 and appauld him on his efforts. This driver is as close to perfect as I believe we are going to get at this point I believe our hardware is the limiting factor. The 2.4 will stay in my camera for now.
yo bro brian2k1.....
can u translate ur description above with photo......
any picture ????
--
Posted: 2006-07-16 12:14:35
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
