Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : N1™ 3.05 SM, Camdriver for k790/k800/k810/k818 & N1™ 2.5 Final camdriver1 for /k800/k810.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> N1™ 3.05 SM, Camdriver for k790/k800/k810/k818 & N1™ 2.5 Final camdriver1 for /k800/k810.
Bookmark topic
No! C702i is better
C702i camdriver have better auto mode, but on k800i you must put right exposure manual...
But like C702i have some problems with AF, k800i have more details on pic.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 15:53:53
Edit :
Quote
so which SE CyberShot phone has the best camera (or produces the best photos)?
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 16:04:31
Edit :
Quote
For me that's k800i but if you know how to manually set right exposure, saturation...
But if you want to point'n'shot for me that's C702i
Oh yes and there's and k770i
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-07-03 15:14 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 16:06:38
Edit :
Quote
yes the k800 would have done alot better if i selected the correct modes on my camdriver, but it still can't beat c702's outdoor and indoor photo quality.
i compared the c702 to a samsung digi cam here
i tweaked the settings on the digicam a bit, custom whitebalance, added sharpness.
c702 is just auto mode
samsung s860 vs c702
samsung:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12745
c702:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12746[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-07-03 15:50 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 16:47:42
Edit :
Quote
C702 is less sensitive ( or more noise) than K800 due to smaller sensor size.
K800 got heavier noise reduction (more artifact) than C720.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 21:23:05
Edit :
Quote
The c702 has less/different noise reduction hence more noise more detail.
--
Posted: 2008-07-03 21:36:57
Edit :
Quote
At 'indoor' i think that k800 is beter , but outdoor c702 beat him
give some macro test
[ This Message was edited by: ssnopyybg on 2008-07-04 15:19 ]
--
Posted: 2008-07-04 16:19:04
Edit :
Quote
i comparad the macro's
c702 VS K800 macros
c702: R3BA035 , standard camdriver
K800: k810 R8BA024, camdriver N1 3.05
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00001.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00027.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00002-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00025.jpg
c702
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]34/sniper100590/DSC00001-1.jpg
k800
http://i222.photobucket.com/a[....]d234/sniper100590/DSC00023.jpg
__________________________________________________________
c702 skinned mediaplayer taken with my k800
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=12856
--
Posted: 2008-07-08 14:34:37
Edit :
Quote
when i record video with my k790 and i play this see three vertical lines, with other versions of camdrivers not, please what i do
--
Posted: 2008-07-08 15:51:25
Edit :
Quote
Wow, the C702 camera is a lot better, and what I would call "real" 3.2MP. The K800 just looks like crap and smudged compared to the C702.
--
Posted: 2008-07-10 18:05:32
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
