>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia Lumia 1020
Bookmark topic
Yes I still have... And And yes I think 1020 is a 920 with 41 MP !
Even I think the Sony i1 present better results than the top of the line Windows !
--
Posted: 2013-08-10 22:52:41
Edit :
Quote
but Sony i1 has not yet been unveiled !
1020 looks like a 920 ok but the camera is not the same. It's a new hardware version of 41mp pureview but you don't like it.
I think i will test the 1020 at launch (maybe)
--
Posted: 2013-08-10 23:05:29
Edit :
Quote
The
cu015170 already tested both devices and mostou clearly that the 808 is much better than 1020, at least for me no doubt !
PS: I know that the Sony i1 has not been released, but all that was said that he will, it proves very promising and quite capable of being better than 1020 !
--
Posted: 2013-08-10 23:14:57
Edit :
Quote
I had 2 808 and i never really like its camera maybe this is why I prefer camera of 1020.
Just an example why the trees are so blurry on this picture ? :
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/cam/nokia/808_pureview/201308102214urIRpx.jpg it's a nice pics of Sylwester
However good light conditions, landscape...it's typical of 808.
Finally, I do not ask me more questions, I don't ever take a 808 with its low resolution screen and interface of another age.
Nokia Lumia 1020 vs Canon Rebel XS DSLR (video review) ->
http://wmpoweruser.com/nokia-lumia-1020-vs-canon-rebel-xs-dslr-video-review/
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 15:23:53
Edit :
Quote
you would have a hard time keeping that tree line sharp with any camera phone. Whenever you see a photograph by the 808 from someone who knows what they are doing, its pretty much certain that no other phone can match it pixel per pixel in those particular conditions..
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 15:58:26
Edit :
Quote
Cu015170, I totally agree with you !
In the hands of those who know and really understand photography, the 808 is better than 1020, S IV and any other phone ever launched in history !
No other cameraphone delivers much detail, color fidelity and zero noise !
For these and others that he is respected and acclaimed even by professionals in the field of digital photography!
I say and I repeat 1020 is a 920 with 41 mp, while 808 is the
True Pureview !
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 19:48:14
Edit :
Quote
I think im starting to prefer the 1020's camera.
Im one for true imaging quality with no artificial interruption but the 1020 does seem to have the edge in many various occasions. Low light is one of them. Ive read the comparisons on AAS, but I think sometimes we need the extra help from algorithms or hardware such as OIS which clearly benefits the camera more than simple raw data.
I dunno, I could happily own both phones and love their cameras.
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 22:59:08
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-08-11 22:59:08, etaab wrote:
I think im starting to prefer the 1020's camera.
Im one for true imaging quality with no artificial interruption but the 1020 does seem to have the edge in many various occasions. Low light is one of them. Ive read the comparisons on AAS, but I think sometimes we need the extra help from algorithms or hardware such as OIS which clearly benefits the camera more than simple raw data.
I dunno, I could happily own both phones and love their cameras.
1020 is junk. A grainy, noisy, oversaturated junk.
And it's night photos are overexposed and looks unnatural.
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 23:38:18
Edit :
Quote
For the overexposed night shots you have the exposure setting
I totaly agree with you
etaab
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 23:42:21
Edit :
Quote
Compare these pictures.
1020
http://i.imgur.com/h4UfvMc.jpg
808
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ureview/201308111953K07Yc0.jpg
Look at the pictures at 100% zoom. 1020 is terrible!
[ This Message was edited by: G3ORGE on 2013-08-11 22:56 ]
--
Posted: 2013-08-11 23:56:25
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
