>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
Gives me an idea what my phone looks like next to Z, like a baby so cute.
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 01:35:11
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-10 22:52:37, -XYZ wrote:
I don't agree at all. Samsung is unlikely to use Exynos 5 quad, because the Exynos 5 dual draws more than twice as much power as the S4 Pro. Sure its faster, but that's obvious; A15 cores were designed for use in servers after all. If they use a quad core processor, or less likely, a octa core processor, they'll struggle to avoid melting the phone without severely underclocking the A15 cores.
Big numbers mean nothing to me and most other people, there is a reason alienware doesn't sell in the same volumes as the MacBooks, even though they cost the same and are much more powerful. The Xperia Z is an extremely classy phone and if it can be desirable to people, it matters little how powerful the SGS4 is. The iPhone 5 is more powerful than the GS3, but did that alone make it sell? Nope, brand power did that.
More than making ultra-powerful phones, Sony should focus on building a desirable brand. They already had strong brand presence, they just need to play on it and advertise their phones as such.
I didnt said specifically that it is the Exynos 5. I said quad, but my mind was over the 4 one. Anyway, I kinda agree. But, even though, they have two base companies (as mentioned by unknown) the tech one, who knows about what's inside, and the average, that doesn't know shit.
Just like Apple, Samsung have their loyal users, who are used to TouchWiz and might be scared to change to something different. At least I think like that.
But, for you and unknown, I don't think those were real constructive comments. You basically hated the entire thing based on a single paragraph.
As the title says, it's my vision over everything.
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 02:48:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-11 02:48:55, Felimenta97 wrote:
On 2013-01-10 22:52:37, -XYZ wrote:
I don't agree at all. Samsung is unlikely to use Exynos 5 quad, because the Exynos 5 dual draws more than twice as much power as the S4 Pro. Sure its faster, but that's obvious; A15 cores were designed for use in servers after all. If they use a quad core processor, or less likely, a octa core processor, they'll struggle to avoid melting the phone without severely underclocking the A15 cores.
Big numbers mean nothing to me and most other people, there is a reason alienware doesn't sell in the same volumes as the MacBooks, even though they cost the same and are much more powerful. The Xperia Z is an extremely classy phone and if it can be desirable to people, it matters little how powerful the SGS4 is. The iPhone 5 is more powerful than the GS3, but did that alone make it sell? Nope, brand power did that.
More than making ultra-powerful phones, Sony should focus on building a desirable brand. They already had strong brand presence, they just need to play on it and advertise their phones as such.
I didnt said specifically that it is the Exynos 5. I said quad, but my mind was over the 4 one. Anyway, I kinda agree. But, even though, they have two base companies (as mentioned by unknown) the tech one, who knows about what's inside, and the average, that doesn't know shit.
Just like Apple, Samsung have their loyal users, who are used to TouchWiz and might be scared to change to something different. At least I think like that.
But, for you and unknown, I don't think those were real constructive comments. You basically hated the entire thing based on a single paragraph.
As the title says, it's my vision over everything.
Hey, I read the whole thing, and it offends me that you think I wrote what I did based off of one paragraph.
I sort of understand where you're coming from, but I just don't agree.
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 02:57:42
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-10 23:46:42, unknownC151A wrote:
Sorry, but I think it's a badly written article. The article is based consumers with tech knowledge viewpoints. An average consumer don't care whatever type of quad core inside. As long it's a quad core, they will go for it.
I actually agree with "unknown". In India we have a phone from Micromax A110. It is a 5 inch with a dual core processor from Mediatek. And I can see many people using it. It is quite famous here. People are saying for a phone that has dual core processor and costs 10K what else do you need!!!!
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 03:08:55
Edit :
Quote
Well, indeed. But as I said, it was my vision over it. Based on what I read from many comments, and what I understand from them. My opinion...
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 03:55:34
Edit :
Quote
@Feli
Samsung SIV will not be more powerful than Z.
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 03:57:17
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-11 03:57:17, randomuser wrote:
@Feli
Samsung SIV will not be more powerful than Z.
Equally or lower, then?
And for XYZ, and unknown, sorry, I said that without thinking much. As usual, most of the times.
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 03:59:14
Edit :
Quote
Well Feli, equal for most part. In a few benchmarks Z could be faster, and in some S4. Due to Exynos 5 being power hungry, Samsung is unable to make it perform significantly faster than Z as it would mean pathetic battery life and overheating
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-01-11 03:03 ]
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 04:01:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-11 03:57:17, randomuser wrote:
@Feli
Samsung SIV will not be more powerful than Z.
Keep dreaming!
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 04:04:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-11 04:04:33, DACHA wrote:
On 2013-01-11 03:57:17, randomuser wrote:
@Feli
Samsung SIV will not be more powerful than Z.
Keep dreaming!
Not Dreaming. Just stating a fact
--
Posted: 2013-01-11 04:08:30
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
