>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> SONY Xperia Rumors 2013 Edition
Bookmark topic
On 2013-01-13 15:09:46, thejosetree wrote:
And may I know if you are using professional equipment to judge screens ? If not, then your statement that Sony screens are worse than others doesn't mean a thing. Notebookcheck.com uses professional super expensive equipment to test displays of laptops, tablets, phones and they rated Xperia T screen ahead of HTC One X, Galaxy Note, S3,LG etc. Only Iphone 5 was rated 2% higher at 89%.
Link please?
http://www.notebookcheck.com/[....]eria-T-Smartphone.84593.0.html
Display Score - 87%
For comparison
Iphone5 - 89%
Htc One S - 82%
HTC One X - 91%
Galaxy S3 - 85%
Galaxy Note 2 - 80%
Remarks -
Purely subjective, the quality of representation and an excellent contrast to AMOLED might notice only in direct comparison - if at all. Black level and contrast are compared with the competition in every way, similar values were the iPhone 5 is measured. Only the Samsung Galaxy S3 has an almost five times as high contrast, but can not score with the brightness.
The viewing angle stability is one of the top smartphones worthy and can be taken literally: the image is not distorted in shallowest angles. A slightly sideways glance tarnishes the image so neither in terms of brightness even in terms of color reproduction.
T has the Xperia. An excellent display, both in the brightness as well as in the representation. In terms of brightness, only the iPhone 5 is a competition.
[ This Message was edited by: randomuser on 2013-01-13 14:28 ]
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 15:23:35
Edit :
Quote
This freaking nonsense don't make sense. Do you view your phone in a odd angle?
Viewing angle dont equate to screen quality. Sony's screen are superior to Samsung AMOLED screens that can't even display whites accurately. And why are factories producing Privacy filters? Isn't this defeating the purpose of this debate?
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 15:27:19
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-13 15:27:19, unknownC151A wrote:
This freaking nonsense don't make sense. Do you view your phone in a odd angle?
Viewing angle dont equate to screen quality. Sony's screen are superior to Samsung AMOLED screens that can't even display whites accurately. And why are factories producing Privacy filters? Isn't this defeating the purpose of this debate?
Hope everyone can understand this
Even if for someone viewing angles are important, I don't think should go as far to call the Z screen a TN one without knowing facts.
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 15:31:48
Edit :
Quote
On 2013-01-13 15:27:19, unknownC151A wrote:
This freaking nonsense don't make sense. Do you view your phone in a odd angle?
Viewing angle dont equate to screen quality. Sony's screen are superior to Samsung AMOLED screens that can't even display whites accurately. And why are factories producing Privacy filters? Isn't this defeating the purpose of this debate?
+1!
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 15:48:47
Edit :
Quote
maybe eyesight problem such as astigmatism, those may need very wide viewing angle to serve them perfectly.
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 16:06:35
Edit :
Quote
Looks like same story when TX has two different screens. I had both. Good viewing angle=good. Bad viewing angle=not as good.
I saw, that at CES purple sample has better screen, than black one.
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 16:35:35
Edit :
Quote
Was it really confirmed that the T/TX used two different screens? And is this region/country-specific?
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 16:41:59
Edit :
Quote
I think, yes. It is region. I had Hong Kong(november)with very good screen and Russia(official! december) with not as good(like on first proto).
So wait and see. It is not just wallpaper problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iy59eBIMC6E
from 5 min.
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 16:55:24
Edit :
Quote
I think RaMu made a good point on view angles issues with Sony phones.
The way I understood, it goes something like this;
- if you prefer overall image quality go with Sony
- if you prefer view angles go with someone else
And the whole argument is kind of a silly one because 95% of the time one holds his phone at his optimal view angle, arguing over remaining 5% is just silly.
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 16:56:27
Edit :
Quote
You not right. It is not just angles. Look at my video. I have 2 devices:
-With good angles and excellent picture overall
-With poor angles and not that good picture.
I`m sure - same here.
It was theory poor=something black(sorry forget))) and good=opticotrast
[ This Message was edited by: xenia on 2013-01-13 16:12 ]
--
Posted: 2013-01-13 17:09:49
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
