>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Nokia
> Nokia Lumia 920 PureView Thread
Bookmark topic
On 2012-11-10 03:08:00, Bonovox wrote:
It made me realise how much work and innovation Nokia has put into this flagship!!
I would say the overall level of innovation is almost on par with the 808.. which is impressive to say the least.
Bluetooth file transfer is supported on Wp8, but its limited to.. mp3,docs, and.. couple of other file types, unlike Symbian and Android where you can transfer whatever you want.
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 05:02:05
Edit :
Quote
@Marly...
Spectacular Tip !!!
Excellent And Night Shots With Unquestionable Quality !!!
If After Upgrade From Software, Nokia Play Getting
50% Of The Quality Of Nighttime Shots In Daytime Shots... Undoubtedly Back To Believing In Windows Phone And Especially In The Lumia 920 PureView LITE As a
Real Photographic Solution For Those Who Seek Great Performance And a Robust Operating System !!!
P.S: Now I'm Even Thinking Of Considering The Possibility Of Buying a 920 PureView LITE, To Make Company To My 808 PureView PRO, Galaxy S III And My Newest Handset Apple iPhone 5 !
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 05:09:55
Edit :
Quote
Bluetooth file transfer on WP8 also supports sending pictures and videos, the type of files I've been sending most with my N900, N9 and Symbians.
We all know the situation: party with friends or family, you take a cute pic from the toddler of a friend or cousin and the parents want to have it on their phones too. Of course you can email it, but sending through BT is the easiest way.
WP8 phones also have NFC, which is why pairing two devices with this option (Tap&Send) is easier and faster, as it's been in the past.
I've noticed that with our N9 and 808 PureView: you just tap and it's done
[ This Message was edited by: Marly on 2012-11-10 04:36 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 05:16:52
Edit :
Quote
Well That International Version 920 PureView LITE Could Have The Same GPU !!!
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia[....]ad_of_adreno_225-news-5062.php
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 05:38:55
Edit :
Quote
http://sdrv.ms/Zh9yFx
https://skydrive.live.com/red[....]9!307&authkey=!AN_eXn4HVEB_4L4
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 06:48:47
Edit :
Quote
Pretty mediocre photos. If I bought my PureView phone, and it would be taking this kind of pictures (look at the blur on car registration) I would be mad.
https://qp24mw.blu.livefilest[....]Arc/WP_20121109%202.jpg?psid=1
On the other hand, it produces fantastic videos. Must be practically the only real advantage of OIS here.
And really, what is wrong with people these days? Doing reviews of photos and posting them in LAME resolution like 0.3MP (640x480), while they want the highest PPI possible, we now have phones with 2MP resolution on screen, so it's very f*cking lame to post photos in 0.3 MP resolution, I mean wtf. Even videos they post on YouTube are on much higher resolution (2MP). When I have to watch video to have a better look at camera pics quality that's really low. And now with the Nexus 10 coming, which happen to have mind-blowing 4MP resolution screen, I would excpect all sites to post much higher resolution pics, but noooooooo, let's post low resolution photos.
This is how thoose "amazing" amsterdam pics would look fullscreen on Nexus 10, it's ridicolous! How about post pics in higher resolution please
P.S Yes, I woke up on the wrong side of the bed
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2012-11-10 09:48 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 10:30:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2012-11-10 10:30:27, admad wrote:
Pretty mediocre photos. If I bought my PureView phone, and it would be taking this kind of pictures (look at the blur on car registration) I would be mad.
This is not the PureView phone, some PureView technology has been used, but the one and only PureView phone is the Nokia 808 PureView.
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 11:00:36
Edit :
Quote
@admad,did you not read that there will be a software update to improve daytime shots. Nokia has realised this and for some odd reason the same thing happened to the 800/900 etc when first released,the photos came out poor. But they improved with an update
@Gauralhos,yes great review. @admad,I couldn't get out the wrong side of the bed in the morning. My bed is against the wall
_________________
Material things don't matter,but Rock n Roll does!!!!
Nokia Lumia 800 White
[ This Message was edited by: Bonovox on 2012-11-10 11:09 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 11:26:00
Edit :
Quote
@Guarulhos can you send me a PM?? Wanna have a chat
Don't worry just wanna keep the peace. Thanks.
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 17:06:49
Edit :
Quote
The pics from the pureviewclub can be seen at full resolution of flickr .. you just have to click view original.
But yes, I've been saying that since they posted the white paper on "phase 2" .. there was no way we will see anything special.. not with those tiny pixels. It takes average looking photos, a little better at night, and good videos with HAAC mics to help the sound recording. Overall, still a better camera package then most of its competitors.
Its like those new Exmor RS stacked sensors from Sony.. 1.1 micron pixels, and they have everybody excited about the quality they will be producing, but in reality it will be mediocre just like all the other 1.1 micron pixel cameras.
I feel like "OIS" was a side project that was supposed to be added to the main PureView PRO (maybe with a 20Mpix sensor) technology at one point, but they ran out of time because everyone was screaming about a pureview windows phone, and made into a separate project and called it "phase 2" of the pureview tech..
I think its a mistake to call it PureView, because there is nothing PURE about the pictures its produces.. it makes perfect sense on the 808 because the pixels are "pure" thanks to the oversampling algorithms..
[ This Message was edited by: cu015170 on 2012-11-10 16:33 ]
--
Posted: 2012-11-10 17:32:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply