News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 Bookmark topic

@679

im glad u have the same problem as me, i thought i was the only one that got problem also many people ignore the pictures i post before so i get no feedback n have no idea wat drive can do better than that
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 10:20:07
Edit : Quote




Try sarmadgilani 5.6 posted on this page. Its have bit slower but more acurate focusing - at least for me. If i be able to insert its autofocus into 21.9 - i will be happy - but 21.9 is so well done and shine polished that i can't intrude in its body...
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 10:36:08
Edit : Quote


@679 & whatsucka

try to replace in seq_set_prop_7_0:

#CMD(03,28)
#SET(08,28) -> #SET(08,3C)
#CMD(34,01) -> #CMD(34,81)
#W_F_M_T;

and report about results... should be slower but more accurate


_________________

http://picasaweb.google.com/raiderski
W800 CID36 R1BD001

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-05-25 09:53 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 10:52:31
Edit : Quote


Hey...I have the same problem on v21.91. The autofocus on macro is not stable, on some range the autofocus doesnt work..but when I take a few centimetres back, the autofocus is working again.
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 10:58:34
Edit : Quote




The min distance for macro is 10cm. I use phone body to chek it - it has the same length 100mm...
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 11:30:33
Edit : Quote




Yep, after comparison 5.6 and 21.9 i've got the same correction,
also i belive the next lines also should be changed - but i'am not for sure

NOM_FPS=#SET(08,3C) //was #SET(08,40)
#CMD(03,28) //was #CMD(03,40)
#CMD(34,81)
#W_F_M_T;

NIM_FPS=#SET(08,1E) //was #SET(08,18)
#CMD(03,0A) //was #CMD(03,18)
#CMD(34,01) //was #CMD(34,41)
#W_F_M_T;

You opinion?
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 11:42:03
Edit : Quote




no need to do that... it's only video recording options and determine video frames per second. every author different values:

3C/1E - Chengrong
40/18 - Kriomag
44/28 - SPU
etc.

so... as you can see no agreement at all :/ (i use 3C/28)

_________________

http://picasaweb.google.com/raiderski
W800 CID36 R1BD001

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2007-05-25 13:35 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 13:57:53
Edit : Quote




Yup i also faced the same problem until i revert to super cam 8.54. I was wondering why others can take wonderful pictures with kriomag driver. However, i did not give up and i flash back kriomag 21.91 and it was nice. I think that the auto white balance could be the problem. Why not you try use fine mode and disable auto white balance to see if it improves ?

Here are some pictures i took with kriomag 21.91...
http://files.myopera.com/CY97/albums/238841/IMG9BAP5QSOVE.jpg

http://files.myopera.com/CY97/albums/238841/IMGJT30QKO2LW.jpg

http://files.myopera.com/CY97/albums/238841/IMGREB4N33GLY.jpg




[ This Message was edited by: cy97 on 2007-05-25 13:11 ]
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 14:10:46
Edit : Quote




Thx a lot. I also add next correction according to 5.6

seq_set_prop_7_1=#CMD(03,0A)
#SET(08,1F) --> #SET(08,1e)
#CMD(34,01)
#W_F_M_T;

Is it useless? And a stuped question. I belive it is no matter to write "1E" or "1e" in camdriver. Yes?
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 14:28:55
Edit : Quote


@679
not useless - 1E value is visible in original SE camdrv. you can use big and small letters ofcourse.
--
Posted: 2007-05-25 14:47:32
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Reply

Forum Index