News Forum Phone database

> New Topic
> Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Software, Firmware and Drivers > Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 Bookmark topic

@ Mark_Q

i had to admit that i don't have MXE so.. i could not test with flash accesory on it.

And i never said that is totaly finished.. i asked the people to test it and to post their results... because i belive that always is room for the BETTER.

So if you know a way to improve the MXE pictures... please be my guest... I'm not intending to buy 1 recently.. so ... even if i want . i cannot test.. and without test.. i cannot be sure that what i changed is totaly corect.

Overexposure yes.. if you find a better way to evoid that .. please.. give me a pm and let's discus it. because I have some white hair on my head tryng to remove that but not to affect the colors.

please.. i need more pictures or comparations.....

PS.. in your example can you make a square in all the pictures.. my eyes are already tired.. it's hard to notice your point... and by tha way... compresion here can be understand as Quality procent.. not Efective compresion as we know from jpeg. so.. i don;t think that you can do so much with it.. remember that we don't have a realy profesional senzor.. and tehnology is 2 1/2 years old.

I don;t know if you can squize some compresion parameters.. if I learned 89-92 is max that we can do. 5A means 90% (use the calculator from windows in view...advanced..and you'll be able to see hex and dec values). i tryed today with more compresion and more space..

FOR ALL

there is a new one....

http://www.4shared.com/dir/1045259/7f1bef4a/link.html 8-11

please knock yourself out and please post the conclusions.... it's 7-11 with some modifications.. not going to tell what... i want to see if someoane confirm my theories. be advise that the pictures will be a little bit more bigger.. not too much.

need feedback..



[ This Message was edited by: gxg on 2006-10-15 21:31 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-15 22:18:59
Edit : Quote


well i only can try it with low light

in nightmode/fine
811 colors are more warm or yellow like you wish to call, tha 7final and 711
and has less noise.
macro/night on/LED off
8.11

7.11

7.7F


Macro/night on / LED on
8.11


7.11


7.7F





[ This Message was edited by: aabg on 2006-10-16 00:55 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 01:21:15
Edit : Quote


Welcome to the party, Mark_Q, another pro. I like the way you analyse things. Please do join us and comment further .
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 03:44:08
Edit : Quote


i couldnt find any difference between 7.7 final and 8.11. sorry for my bad eyes
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 05:29:10
Edit : Quote


ok.. but in order to see the clarity of the picture, sharp and all the others... usualy is necesary to take distance shots....

811 have something changed than previous 711.. one of the changes is the dimension of the picture.. instead to be 200k those can be 500k or 300k... all depends on the quantity on info within the picture.
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 07:14:10
Edit : Quote


OK, here is my first set of samples. Please note that I did comparison against the original camdriver, not any other modded version.

All photos taken with K750 on mini tripod and with self-timer. You prefer to see the quality of the camdriver's rendering, not the steadiness of my hand, don't you...

original K750 camdriver, nightmode, e.c. 0.0 (ISO 500):
http://www.ImageShack.us" />

original K750 camdriver, nightmode, e.c. -0.3 (ISO 400):
http://www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg's camdriver, nightmode, e.c. 0.0 (ISO 400):
http://www.ImageShack.us" />


original K750 camdriver, with MXE-60, e.c. 0.0:
http://www.ImageShack.us" />

original K750 camdriver, with MXE-60, e.c. -0.3:
http://www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg's camdriver, with MXE-60, e.c. 0.0:
http://www.ImageShack.us" />

[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-10-16 06:54 ]
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 07:51:37
Edit : Quote


mark,are using the 8.11 or 7.11?
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 08:04:23
Edit : Quote


g-roxx0304,

I have checked the info header in camdriver:
info_major_ver=7;
info_minor_ver=0B;
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 08:31:23
Edit : Quote


1) Using 711 .. look @ least 1 page back to see that he already note what drivers he used and will be used in comparation.

Mark_Q... you are a real gent'.

Welcome to the testers. PM your mail and will talk about it... or YM or MSN..or ICQ.

As I notice you did the most normal thing to do: compare with stoc driver.

As i notice:
1) choke and artefacts (based on iso and light) are no longer present in my driver.. at least not so obvious.
2) In original camera doen't matter wich value of compresion.. there is still overexposure effect. not wrilly overexposure.. but looks like it.
3) indoor we saw it...

I don't have tripod.. so i cannot guaranty that the pictures are steady as a rock. can you try snapshot something.. from your window? i want to see from you something @ distance...

What about the focus? What do you think? I notice that with my new values applied in 711 (and in 811) focus operation is very quick. I had version wich focus was a pain on the hass:)
--
Posted: 2006-10-16 08:42:18
Edit : Quote


Here is my new batch of samples. Again K750 on tripod and self-timer on all. Versions 7 and 8 included.

original K750 camdriver, white balance Auto, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />

original K750 camdriver, white balance Auto, e.c. -0.3:
www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg camdriver 7.11, white balance Auto, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg camdriver 8.11, white balance Auto, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />

original K750 camdriver, white balance Cloudy, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />

original K750 camdriver, white balance Cloudy, e.c. -0.3:
www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg camdriver 7.11, white balance Cloudy, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />

gxg camdriver 8.11, white balance Cloudy, e.c. 0.0:
www.ImageShack.us" />


--
Posted: 2006-10-16 12:26:52
Edit : Quote

---

New Topic   Topic Locked

Forum Index