>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs N95 pic quality
Bookmark topic
We talking about the pic quality, not video rec. we all know N95 have better video rec..
How ever N95 fans just don't let it down, that K850i take better pic.
_________________
---------------------
K800i K750i W910i W880i
---------------------
We All know, Cash is the King!
[ This Message was edited by: SilveR. on 2007-11-10 13:30 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 14:23:11
Edit :
Quote
Yes it should be locked. But, oh it is so much fun! In some cases it really tests just how far blind loyalty will go.
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 14:27:48
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-11-10 14:23:11, SilveR. wrote:
We talking about the pic quality, not video rec. we all know N95 have better video rec..
How ever N95 fans boys just don't let it down, that K850i take better pic.
You got it very wrong.
It is not N95 fans that dont "let it down" but the following reviewers (pls forgive me for posting this again as it is for the benefit of this little myopic friend)
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]-Review-review-r_1846-p_5.html
We are disappointed by the Sony Ericsson K850 and how it performs as a camera. Really, considering it is the top Cyber-shot branded phone, it should be one of the best on the market, but the comparison with the old N95 and the G600 shows different things.
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_[....]50_vs_nokia_n95-review-162.php
In this heavy-weight championship series the Sony Ericsson K850 managed to collect a total of 31 points, while the Nokia N95 managed to beat it by a slight margin with a total of 34 points. Those numbers are indicative only and you should give more weight to the results of the tests that matter most to you. It was a close call, but this time we prefer the Nokia model.
http://smape.com/en/reviews/n[....]Ericsson_K850ivsNokia_N95.html
Sony Ericsson were able to design a well-balanced 5 Mpix camera phone which isn’t bad at all at taking pictures but it has very few advantages over the N95 while the latter was able to beat its competitor in quite a number of tests.
http://www.phonedaily.com/news/?news_id=6166
translated...N95 relatively stronger/better color and showing more photo details gives N95 a small win (over K850)
http://mobilarena.hu/teszt/no[....]es_csata/na_akkor_a_kepek.html
http://mobil.idnes.cz/sony-er[....]24_212325_mob_sonyericsson_vok
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 14:28:35
Edit :
Quote
@Dogmann
Each phone will beat the other in one way or another in certain circumstances, but both are mediocre when the pictures are blown up when compared to any decent 5.0MP cam.
People are just savaging each other over which picture is
worse than the other, when ultimately neither is absolutely amazing.
Why not appreciate what
can be achieved for a change.
@mib1800
If you think for one minute I'm going to spend time, searching the far reaches of the internet just to engage you in a petty game of 'I've found more reviews than you' then you have more time on your hands than you deserve. Honestly!
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 14:50:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-11-10 14:50:55, goldenface wrote:
@mib1800
If you think for one minute I'm going to spend time, searching the far reaches of the internet just to engage you in a petty game of 'I've found more reviews than you' then you have more time on your hands than you deserve. Honestly!
Then why the heck you try to insinuate that the 5 reviews I have given doesnt mean a thing but the ONE review that you have given seems to carry more weight. You call it "petty" because you cannot find more solid proof to prove otherwise. This by itself, imo is petty.
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 15:07:58
Edit :
Quote
FFS... yawn
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 15:18:09
Edit :
Quote
i think the pics from K850i is close to reality than the N95 ones
N95 i've got for 3 mounths
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 15:29:50
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-11-10 13:52:05, plankgatan wrote:
Nokia sucks...Sonyericsson rules...daahhhhhhh..(yeh, i know..im childish...
before you say such nunsense show me from your beloving k850 a pic that loocks a bit closer to that photo taken with N73 in FULL size & without EDITING
as i said before the k850 has for my opinion a low quality cam that shame
the label sybershot.
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 20:13:09
Edit :
Quote
DarKMaGiCiaN Posts: > 500
@yaniv84
N73??
I dont even know if some parts of the pic are real or someone paint it ^_*
@all
I have some old full size pic
http://www.bof3d.com/up/get-10-2007-bof3d_coma74ppyru.JPG
http://img526.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc01000xc4.jpg
http://img339.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc00964nd6.jpg
http://www.bof3d.com/up/get-10-2007-bof3d_com9y9xwzsr.JPG
and check the noise here
http://www.bof3d.com/up/get-10-2007-bof3d_com2zsnldka.JPG
http://www.bof3d.com/up/get-11-2007-bof3d_combratojx3.jpg
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 20:48:31
Edit :
Quote
ALL the pic that you uppload have a low quality & HOW MUCH NOISE!!!!
specialy in the second & the third pic just look at the sky & see how
it looks wish full of noises & mix of colors
no matter how mutch you try to convice your self the pic quality of the k850 realy sucks.
[ This Message was edited by: yaniv84 on 2007-11-10 22:01 ]
--
Posted: 2007-11-10 23:00:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
