>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Rumours
> Huge Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2007
Bookmark topic
Btw on the front shot you can clearly see a camera shutterbutton.
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 17:39:48
Edit :
Quote
I think the picture of the back of the phone is entirely fake. The front looks genuine though.
How would you explain the different screen surround - grooved instead of graded.
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 17:45:47
Edit :
Quote
I think in both pics the left phone is Elena and the right is a normal M600i ?
Pic 1: Shows Elena on left and M600i on right.
Pic 2: Shows Elena flipped over and the same M600i on the right.
Does anyone else think this? Or is the phone on the right NOT a M600i?
It can't be Lizzy since that one has no cam? And maybe Maria was the one with the red keys then?
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 17:57:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-03-23 15:35:17, PeterKay wrote:
Very soon one feels.
Thats what you said last time.
--
Posted: 2007-03-23 22:42:12
Edit :
Quote
Guys, monday starts CTIA, new symbian version is gonna be presented, i wonder if SE wont present its new uiq3 products there
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 02:20:30
Edit :
Quote
I can only imagine that this is a very early prototype. SE tends to use the same body design for similar phones, i.e. look at the W300 protype which was just a Z530 with a
logo scribed on the back cover. The camera shutter button does throw me off a bit though.
But what I really think is, that this is a half truth. I find it interesting with the news of an upcoming announcement, which could very well be a number of UIQ phones, that suddenly a leak comes out about Elena. These photos were taken 9 days ago.
Have a look at the closeup of the camera:
A) It doesn't look quite right around the edges.
B) The transition over the lens cover seems very un-realistic.
C) If it were real, it's held on by screws
So the person could be duped into thinking that it's Elena, when it's probably Lizzy. So I reckon it's Lizzy with a little addon to throw us off SE's trail.
UPDATE:
Added the 5MP clamshell rumour even I doubt it is real. Probably a misinterpretation of Irina.
Fixed announcement date (thanks to those who pointed it out!).
_________________
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood.
Source: Wikipedia
Support these improvements for Esato[ This Message was edited by: shaliron on 2007-03-24 02:18 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 03:00:47
Edit :
Quote
I think that about the 3.2 MegaPixels logotype is just an optic efect like the Samsung OLOGRAPH logotype.
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 04:04:53
Edit :
Quote
If it was really wouldn't it have the f length and ratio like every other SE phone . Also it doesn't say autofocus on it.
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 04:28:43
Edit :
Quote
A) It doesn't look quite right around the edges.
B) The transition over the lens cover seems very un-realistic.
C) If it were real, it's held on by screws
You people suspect too much.
The reason why the bottom part of the words 3.2 mega pixels is funny is all to do with the refraction of light that's all. Sort of why does the top right part of the black circle have a bright line on the edges while the bottom left is just pure black?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrection_of_light
As for the screws part, it's not screws... It's just two parts sticking further out so that when you place the phone on it's back, those two thingy will be what's touching the surface and not the camera's lens.
Edit:Sentence structure was a little confusing
[ This Message was edited by: dxreaper on 2007-03-24 04:10 ]
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 05:06:23
Edit :
Quote
the picture is definitely real. The refraction of light is someting to point out just like what "dxreaper" said.
The bottom of the back of the phone does say SE123(most of the old protos is like that) and the lighting of the corners of the logo are the right direction which the light comes from the top while the bottom of the phone is reflected with Orange light.
If you think the SE123 is also fake, then take a look at the M600i buttons and tell me what color of light does the button reflect? an Orange light also! I don't think anyone would take much of their damn time to make such a perfect FAKE picture. All the fake pictures we've seen all look like trash and you could actually tell by an instance, but this is definitely real, just an early prototype before changing the masking of the camera.
--
Posted: 2007-03-24 05:25:59
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
