Sony Ericsson / Sony : Software, Firmware and Drivers : Withanâ„¢ Camera Driver V3/S3 Rev.1 for SE k790/k800/k810 phones
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Software, Firmware and Drivers
> Withanâ„¢ Camera Driver V3/S3 Rev.1 for SE k790/k800/k810 phones
Bookmark topic
On 2008-01-30 13:30:57, Rodrigop wrote:
Ultimate v2.11 Withan™ - what´s the main diference between the Vivid Colour and the Standard to this new one.
tks!!!!!!!
Read first post carefully. (And when installing/compiling software, you must ever read the Readmes)
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 13:36:09
Edit :
Quote
My bad! i has this page bookmarked and always go to the last page, now i saw the differences there.
tks again.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 13:38:43
Edit :
Quote
Arfi-Gorgona Posts: > 500
I finally made it

Thanks guys and sorry for the trouble.
Edit:I took some photos and they had a lot of noise...I wonder why
_________________
Zhto h Arfes-gorgones
[ This Message was edited by: Arfi-Gorgona on 2008-01-30 12:58 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 13:44:46
Edit :
Quote
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 13:57:53
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 15:43:46
Edit :
Quote
thx...and the difference is just that the "Withan" version has no noise and the rest is just like the VividColour...am i right??
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 16:41:29
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-30 15:43:46, jomateixa wrote:
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
in the "Withan" version i had found 4 lines with force flash and in "VividColour" just 2..i have deleted them all...is that allright??
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 16:49:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-30 16:49:37, theshadow03 wrote:
On 2008-01-30 15:43:46, jomateixa wrote:
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
in the "Withan" version i had found 4 lines with force flash and in "VividColour" just 2..i have deleted them all...is that allright??
Yes.
I decided to force the flash RER in VividColour and put 00 mode in Twilight portrait of the Withan so please re-download the 2.11 VividColour and Withan the ones who have downloaded them
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-01-30 16:53 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 17:48:34
Edit :
Quote
here are some pictures
vivid 2.1 auto flash
vivid 2.1 flash off
withan auto flash
withan flash off
vivid vs withan
are there other differences between vivid 2.1 and 2.11 besides the flash problem ... i mean "VividColour™ version has really insane" and " *VividColour™ ~> Colour gain to insanity (0x0b) " .. its the same thing ?
[ This Message was edited by: yorulezkos on 2008-01-30 18:31 ]
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 19:13:34
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-01-30 19:13:34, yorulezkos wrote:
here are some pictures
vivid 2.1 auto flash
vivid 2.1 flash off
withan auto flash
withan flash off
vivid vs withan
are there other differences between vivid 2.1 and 2.11 besides the flash problem ... i mean "VividColour™ version has really insane" and " *VividColour™ ~> Colour gain to insanity (0x0b) " .. its the same thing ?
[ This Message was edited by: yorulezkos on 2008-01-30 18:31 ]
Yes in 2.11 the only change is the FF fix.
--
Posted: 2008-01-30 19:51:19
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply