>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson 8.1MP C905 Discussion (Shiho)
Bookmark topic
On 2008-10-24 08:05:46, gtr83 wrote:
SM@PE seems to have a fairer judgment, maybe because they don't regard themselves too high as journalists.
The guys at Smape are the SAME guys who used to work for us 6 months ago
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:23:41
Edit :
Quote
ZOMG!!! 31 visitors browsing. Is that like a new record!
sorry for teh off topic
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:26:19
Edit :
Quote
@plank:
first you should get familiar with JBenchmarks, it is a program used to test the performance of the J2ME Virtual Machines installed on mobile phones (not the native OS like what you are trying to point out) and the project capuchin API is the culprit for the reduction in points there. the lack of this new yet processing hungry API on the C902 obviously explains it's superiority in the test. so forget about the fictious allegations about C905 having a downgraded/undercloked CPU. this time it's not the same thing as with the ill-fated K850.
_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead - go instead where there is no path and leave a trail"
"Our Greatest glory is not in never failing - but in rising everytime we fall"
Are you good in hand drawing? Then visit this thread! [url=http://ww
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2008-10-24 10:34 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:31:52
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-10-24 11:26:19, yea g wrote:
ZOMG!!! 31 visitors browsing. Is that like a new record!
sorry for teh off topic
Maybe you would like to visit the 2008 rumors thread during the huge announcements at MWC and find out(by reading the posts) how many are online that time on one of the most precious moments at esato
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:38:13
Edit :
Quote
one of the reasons why c905 performs slower then c902 at the benchmark, is because c902 have a bit stronger cpu....
(i must say, i got a bit surprised when i saw c905 used a slower cpu)
c902 use a ARM9 169 mhz and c905 use a ARM9 146 mhz, (if you believe this web page)
link c905:
http://www.jbenchmark.com/pho[....]mark=ace&D=SonyEricsson%20C905
link c902:
http://www.jbenchmark.com/pho[....]mark=ace&D=SonyEricsson%20C902
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-10-24 10:55 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:44:36
Edit :
Quote
you cant be serious - my good ol K610 got a 212 MHz ??!!!??? more powerful
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:47:35
Edit :
Quote
The only things I could complain about myself is a bit of "lack" of GPS functionality (compared to the N95 with on-memory maps and having to use AGPS) plus the lack of a secondary camera for face2face video calls. However, all other features and functionality largely makes up for this and IMHO makes it the best SE phone so far.
no front-facing camera? tats kinda disappointing...
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:56:39
Edit :
Quote
edit,,,read on wrong line...he he
i do remember when
released c902 their promotion about c902 good cpu...so i think its true.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
cellphone picture collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-10-24 11:01 ]
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:57:39
Edit :
Quote
if you're not using Java applications and games then you don't have to pay attention on JBenchmark results. like razec wrote (this was explained on Esato many times) Java Platform is runtime environment for Java apps/games only, not the phone's whole software
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 11:57:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-10-24 11:44:36, plankgatan wrote:
one of the reasons why c905 performs slower then c902 at the benchmark, is because c902 have a bit stronger cpu....
(i must say, i got a bit surprised when i saw c905 used a slower cpu)
c902 use a ARM9 169 mhz and c905 use a ARM9 146 mhz, (if you believe this web page)
Well that is an estimation made by the jbenchmark software, meaning "the performance of this phone points towards a cpu of this clockrate." The correct interpretation would be that the resource demanding capuchin implementation implicates lower jbenchmark scores, leading the software to false conclusions about processor speed.
--
Posted: 2008-10-24 12:13:33
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
