Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : W800i vs W900i
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > W800i vs W900i Bookmark topic
Page <  12345

marlonski Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2005-12-19 17:12:37, scotsboyuk wrote:
You chaps might be interested in this comparison of the W800's and the W900's camera quality.



Unfortunately I couldn't see the pictures mate

As they're both using the same camera hardware, and even with a vary slight variation in the amount of pixels they produce I wouldn't think it would really make any difference to the quality of picture produced. On the other hand firmware could. There's certainly not a big enough difference to make me want buy the w900 on that alone.

If I were on a 3g contract then it would be the one for me at the moment. It's quite a size, but then most 3g phones are. With it's excellent features I could certainly grow to like it's larger form.

Given the choice, and if anything the very minimal differences in camera performance, the smaller form of the w800 would still be the one for me
--
Posted: 2005-12-19 23:55:53
Edit : Quote

dantheman82 Posts: 148

another thing i have noticed is that when on a call the w900i people sound clearer and there is no back ground noise

some times on w800i and k750i could not hear people clearly tested this is same place so is not reception notice clearer sound on w900i
also sound goes louder
--
Posted: 2005-12-20 14:30:03
Edit : Quote

marlonski Posts: > 500

lets just hope that don't mess that up with the next firmware they produce for the w900
--
Posted: 2005-12-20 21:14:01
Edit : Quote

w900boy Posts: 67

The w900 is basically an upgrade from the w800. There's not an awful lot of new stuff in there, but everything seems much more refined and smooth.
--
Posted: 2005-12-20 23:02:56
Edit : Quote

marlonski Posts: > 500

I appreciate the ecconomy of scale thing with using the same camera hardware to keep costs down, but I can't help thinking that it's a shame, (especially with the w900's larger form) that they didn't spend the money and go for a CCD lens with autofocus. Yes I know that cmos has come a long way however they managed to put one in the s700 and I just can't help thinking that with a CCD lens and autofucus it would have been even better.

_________________
=



[ This Message was edited by: marlonski on 2005-12-22 00:41 ]
--
Posted: 2005-12-21 16:40:38
Edit : Quote
Page <  12345

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home