>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800i VS N73
Bookmark topic
Yeah hes the man, so much that Nokia wouldnt let MR have an n73 to check out until after it was actually launched to so he couldnt put anyone of with his ussually anti Nokia and biased SE comments.
--
Posted: 2006-09-03 20:07:27
Edit :
Quote
se notified already eldar cos of his eraly and not always correct reviews...
--
Posted: 2006-09-03 20:08:40
Edit :
Quote
Thank you bobbafett, at least someone here isnt blinded madley by 1 review.
Depending on where location wise the review is done, the firmware of the model can vary.
The best wway to get a true review is to wait for the people to actually by it themselves.
--
Posted: 2006-09-03 20:11:41
Edit :
Quote
no offenec against eldar or mobile review, cos eldar do deserve the respect ( he has a really nice and respected site ), but he should mention, that the fone whats he testing is a proto and /or has got an earlier fw on it, that would be fair imo. he takes a big responsibility against himself an the site and the visitiors.
--
Posted: 2006-09-03 20:23:17
Edit :
Quote
I can't believe this thread has gone on cause of a pro Nokia guy stirring things up, again, K800I takes better pictures IMO, N73 is a plastic ugly brick compared to the K800I, also the N73 screen breaks very easily so it too like the K800I has it's faults and has no proper flash.
No K800I review I've read has showing such dreadful pictures as at the begining of this thread.
I like this review, much better:
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_k800-review-93.php[ This Message was edited by: apolloa on 2006-09-03 21:57 ]
--
Posted: 2006-09-03 22:35:09
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-03 22:35:09, apolloa wrote:
I can't believe this thread has gone on cause of a pro Nokia guy stirring things up, again, K800I takes better pictures IMO, N73 is a plastic ugly brick compared to the K800I, also the N73 screen breaks very easily so it too like the K800I has it's faults and has no proper flash.
No K800I review I've read has showing such dreadful pictures as at the begining of this thread.
I like this review, much better:
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_k800-review-93.php
[ This Message was edited by: apolloa on 2006-09-03 21:57 ]
Give me a link, show me a review, send me a pic. Just do one of those where it prooves N73's screen breaks easily.
--
Posted: 2006-09-04 11:28:02
Edit :
Quote
every fone display brakes, even 8800. it depends how u drop it...
--
Posted: 2006-09-04 11:29:25
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-04 11:29:25, BobaFett wrote:
every fone display brakes, even 8800. it depends how u drop it...
Ofcourse it does. But he said it breaks very easily.
--
Posted: 2006-09-04 11:32:16
Edit :
Quote
k8 doidnt seemde me better then any other display of a model. imo this dispaly misery is just a new segment of the endless n73 vs k8 war...
--
Posted: 2006-09-04 11:36:52
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-09-03 19:26:13, bavlondon2 wrote:
Will you lot stop bloody talking about Eldars review!!!!!! Those early models are most of the time early editons and buggy anyway. All i her is Eldar this and Eldar that. Why dont you go and find Eldar and bang him up the arsehole""""
If you like the k800 then get the k800, if you like the n73 then get the n73!!!!!
Whats with all the fecking debates.
[ This Message was edited by: bavlondon2 on 2006-09-03 18:27 ]
Does it change the fact that K800 takes more accurate pictures (color-wise) than N73, even in the retail versions of the phone? Or that N73 does color post-processing to the pics to make the colors more saturated and appeal better to consumers?
No.
Eldar's review is still accurate on those matters.
--
Posted: 2006-09-07 07:23:53
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
