>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Tips and tricks
> Nokia 3250 vs W850
Bookmark topic
True! maybe i'll can get one wireless headphones 970 for Xmas and i'll be free of wire ... I Hope
(around 115 euros here in Croatia)
--
Posted: 2006-12-11 21:53:00
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-11 18:14:51, BobaFett wrote:
indeed, a 2 mp cam without af is useless imo. one of the reasons i sold k610 once
@boba - I begto DISAGREE here pal ! I once, HAD a K618i . . . and I manage to capture NICE images on it . . . I gues it will totally depend NOW on how will the object be captured by the . . . phone-o-grapher. But in general, YES, having an AF is an advantage . . .
--
Posted: 2006-12-11 22:31:27
Edit :
Quote
even it sems pointless for me to release w850 without af, when a 2 years old model deserved af ( like k750 ). , but its up to se and its strategy
--
Posted: 2006-12-11 22:43:02
Edit :
Quote
@Bobafet,one and a half year old hehe
yes is strange s.e. was started with af rest without now s.e. got no af on many newest units rest got
--
Posted: 2006-12-11 23:04:00
Edit :
Quote
do they wanna save costs? i cant find any better answer for such decisions. would be interesting to see a w850 vs 3250 pic comparison
--
Posted: 2006-12-11 23:07:11
Edit :
Quote
nokia nokia nokia nokia all bricks old man.their looks even masons in my town often mistakes nokia as bricks.so lazy phones please dont compare w850i with those bricks.ericsson has more cool has easy phone operating system.while opening files in nokia phones it says (please wait) suck it dam phone.but i want to say to se developers and se fans that nokia 6600 and 7610 ranging around 10000 do support symbian.i must say se de.its our minus point.
--
Posted: 2006-12-18 07:58:45
Edit :
Quote
Quote:
On 2006-12-18 07:58:45, Mandu36love wrote:
nokia nokia nokia nokia all bricks old man.their looks even masons in my town often mistakes nokia as bricks.
What? You obviously havent been in touch with the times lately have you.
The Nokia N75 & 6290 are both slightly thicker and I mean slightly - their thinner than the W810 - than the Moto Razr. Both pack 2MP camera with flash yet no Auto Focus that I've confirmed (theres that damn marketing decision again). And the menu's are going to be fast. Not as fast as prototype N95's which is as fast for ANY function (save the Maps but thats over GPS & internal maps in memory so this should be forgiven upon initial loading) just like your dumbed SE phones (P990/M600's arent dumb; yet their going to be faster than the P990).
I hear all kinds of complaints about brick styling and slow OS from ppl that havent used or seen out-in-the-wild videos of recent phones due to ship imminently or less than 2 months out. At least compare current phones with current.
> If you havent noticed SE's phones are taking longer to boot up lately. SE W810 which I own and use as my primary and now only phone for the past 4 months takes 20-26 seconds to load. Newer firmware for Nokia N93 users have posted here in Esato getting the same times!
> I'm love the W810 and its at the pinnicle of SE's excellence save to the K790/800 which I havent got to use just yet; but Nokia is making HUGE strides lately. SE better abandan THIN styling and go for function, performance & features or they'll begin to loose sales!
--
Posted: 2006-12-18 09:17:57
Edit :
Quote
We are here to compare, not to blame or judge and the brick phrase is annoying
This message was posted from a R520m
--
Posted: 2006-12-18 09:20:38
Edit :
Quote
Yeah I may have gone too far there but my post is STILL valid as users are comparing older phones from Nokia to recent phones.
which leads me to a another post elswhere from another quote.
Cheers mates.
--
Posted: 2006-12-18 10:26:22
Edit :
Quote
@prom it was for @mandu
--
Posted: 2006-12-18 10:29:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
