>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Non mobile discussion
> The first man on earth?
Bookmark topic
On 2007-08-31 21:12:15, KingBooker5 wrote:
I am also quite sceptical that humans originated from primates.
In the days of the cavemen, they looked a lot like monkeys, there skelentons are also quite diffrent. About 3000 years later, there are the Egyptians. You cant evolve that quick in 3000 years.
I could be totaly wrong, unless some one could correct me
King whatever that wevolved was created by a supernatural power or force. That is where God and Science meet. Even if humans might have evolved from monkeys then we cn safely assume that the first man on earth looked more like a monkey. That is when God said let there be people.
_________________
Please help
me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:43 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 04:10:25
Edit :
Quote
Not a religious person so not sure about the following. If there was only Adam and Eve in the beginning, it would be logical to assume that inbreeding would be a nessecisity, and in modern times we see that only in a few generations cretinism and other genetic defects are very apparent through inbreeding. Considering the age at which they lived in the bible back then( up to 900 years so I am told), thats a lot of offspring. Also told by my Christian Girlfriend that the world is only 6000 years old! Thats a lot of inbreeding if it is possible in any way to get to our current population.
I dont agree with any of the above, but it's an interesting point.
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 10:21:00
Edit :
Quote
I get what you are saying. What surpises me the most is you all dont seem to mention the first account of the creation of man except for Goldenface. The difference I see here is that Adam was the first thing called human to be created by Gods hands. With those he created at first he just commanded and things hepaned. If adam was the first man according to the last poster, are you saying that inbreeding amongst humans is leagally or religiousely right? I doubt that
_________________
Please help
me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:52 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 11:01:56
Edit :
Quote
Humans and apes have the same ancestor but WE DO NOT evolved from them!!! Don't compare us with something that is totally different.
This is a wide misconception of evolution and most creationist base their arguments about something totally wrong.
I
highly recommend to read the
Miller experiment. If you know basic chemistry and biology then you will understand how organic compounds needed for life could have been formed with basic
inorganic elements.
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 11:04:36
Edit :
Quote
So who do you guys say the first man was. Im just being so inquisitive because I would like to know how we analyse what we read in the history books as far as the Bible is concernsd
_________________
You live today and die tommorrow. So why do you have to wait for the unknown if you do not know the author of life. Grant me everlasting wisdom from above
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 11:59 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 16:50:51
Edit :
Quote
IMO there wasn’t a “first man” just a species even closer related to us and then another species even more closely related to us and so on and so forth till we get us today.
And before that first species there were other species which go waaaay back to the first cells and that (think thats evolution for ya).
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 19:53:43
Edit :
Quote
Puts me in mind of the
Darwin is a Nut thread.
--
Posted: 2007-09-01 20:20:33
Edit :
Quote
There is no "first man" per se, we are merely an evolution from our predecessor. (which, I repeat, is not an ape).
Mouse and humans have the same million years old ancestor, more than 90% of the genetic code is the same. How can it be possible that we have been created then? The mouse is just an example because we share alot of genetic code with other animals.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 13:46:28
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-09-02 13:46:28, Jim wrote:
There is no "first man" per se, we are merely an evolution from our predecessor. (which, I repeat, is not an ape).
Mouse and humans have the same million years old ancestor, more than 90% of the genetic code is the same. How can it be possible that we have been created then? The mouse is just an example because we share alot of genetic code with other animals.
Well if you say so I do agree with you. Fine its science to the rescue. Tell me something now; How did the ancestors come into existence. I think that wil tell us whn exactly the first people were or give us a hint open to conlusions and analysis. I think you wil have to consider the Daltons' Atomic Theory if memory serves me right.
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-01 12:10 ]
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 14:45:03
Edit :
Quote
Well did you read the Miller experiment I pointed out? It's a theory how the first form of live could have been created with chemical reactions. From there it evolved to the world as we know it today.
You can trace from us to the first living cells to the formation of our planet to the formation of the solar system to the milkyway and finally to the big bang so for me beeing created is absolutly a no go. I do read alot about science, I'm also a student in biotechnology engineering so I highly believe in science (it's my job afterall) but there is one thing I might believe in a superpower: big bang theory, too many questions wich science might never be able to answer but, for me, from the moment of the big bang to today there was no god involved.
--
Posted: 2007-09-02 19:48:40
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
