I just cropped this image and done nothing else.
well, above flower is quite small, here is the reference picture to see really how small it is:
Actually coin and the flower are of the same size but as the coin is held under the flower it gives the impression that flower is little bigger.
It was quite windy and hard to get good pics. See you guys, have a nice weekend.
Update:All pictures were taken on overcast and windy day.
The WAY I see it .. . this camfone CAPTURES sharper images at NIGHT-TIME/INDOORS than that of DAYTIME and OUTDOORS
K850 Thread to compare it . . .
On 2007-10-19 15:42:39, jemuel wrote:
On 2007-10-19 10:36:11, AbuBasim wrote:
At first I thought of not posting here as I already have uploaded to the
Photos section but then I thought just to post the ones from there that sucks the least.
Night:
(
Original.)
4 Seconds Exposure time!! That is Superb!!
Is it manually controlled?
--
Posted: 2007-10-20 15:45:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-20 15:27:39, *Jojo* wrote:
The WAY I see it .. . this camfone CAPTURES sharper images at NIGHT-TIME/INDOORS than that of DAYTIME and OUTDOORS
I don't know. I think my daytime shots posted above are quite sharp. I have a few more in the
Photos section. But on the other hand, one explanation could be that most i-mobile 902 owners take extreme care not to move the phone while shooting low-light shots and keep the phone on a stand or some other object, while shooting daytime/indoor photos the phone is usually hand-held and even minor movement or hands trembling will take away some of the clarity.
The i-mobile 902 put priority on producing good photos and adjust shutter times accordingly, usually towards the slower region. This puts more demands on the user and some people may find it difficult to produce good photos with this phone. Most other camera phone vendors put priority on easy-of-use and photo quality suffer.
@mervy,
This is Night mode. This gives a maximum of 4 seconds shutter time. Auto mode gives a maximum of one second. There is no manual mode. ISO can be adjusted Auto/50/100/200. I would have preferred ISO 400 also, like on the KG920.
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-20 18:00 ]
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-10-20 18:07 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-20 18:45:35
Edit :
Quote
(
Original.)
--
Posted: 2007-10-21 20:26:01
Edit :
Quote
Scene mode: Fireworks, EV: 0 and rest of the settings: auto.
[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-22 08:57 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-29 14:08 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-11-06 06:52 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-22 09:49:21
Edit :
Quote
They're arguing about which one is the best camera phone over at the
K850i vs N95 pic quality thread. I thought of making a similar one-photo comparison for the i-mobile 902:
i-mobile 902 vs CANON EOS 300D!
(For those of you who are not familiar with the 300D, it is a 6 MP DSLR.)
Both shots were taken at full auto mode with flash forced off. The 300D has the stock lens that came with the camera and the shot was framed to be as close to the 902 shot as possible.
If you click and compare the original sizes (which are not "original" as Flickr scales them down to 2048 pixels width) then you can see slightly more noise in the 902 shot. This is due to the smaller lens and smaller sensor.
Edit: removed images linked from Flickr.
i-mobile 902
(
Original.)
CANON EOS 300D
(
Original.)
_________________
The Tree of Life is Self-Pruning. -- DarwinAwards.com
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2007-11-11 13:58 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 13:30:12
Edit :
Quote
This is really amazing, i never expected so little difference. To me, 902 colors are bit vibrant but 300d image looks bit sharp.
[ This Message was edited by: Shuuro on 2007-10-29 14:11 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 15:09:33
Edit :
Quote
The difference would perhaps be bigger with a newer and more high-end DSLR . The 300D was introduced more than four years ago and categorized as a "pro-sumer" camera. Today you have the 400D producing 10 MP shots but oddly with a smaller sensor than the 300D...
One more point about the noise: to have the 300D produce the same amount of noise with it's APS-C sized sensor as from the 902's 1/2.5" sensor you have to bring up the ISO to 800 or 1600. Sensor size makes all the difference but a camera phone with an APS-C sized sensor would probably not appeal to most people as it would be too large and unwieldy. And a large sensor requires a large lens, unless you're a big fan of wide-angle shots only.
--
Posted: 2007-10-29 15:39:41
Edit :
Quote
i-mobile 902 vs Olympus C-350
A quick comparison between the 5 MP camera phone and a four year old Point-and-Shoot camera, the 3 MP Olympus C-350. For the following photo the i-mobile 902 was set to 3 MP mode, but otherwise both are in full Auto mode, with flash forced off. These are 800x600 crops shown at 100 percent scale.
i-mobile 902:
Olympus C-350:
--
Posted: 2007-10-30 07:07:55
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
K850 Thread to compare it . . .