>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K850i vs N95 pic quality
Bookmark topic
Razec:
I'm only joking my friend. It's all in good fun. If that makes you feel any better, I use a P1i.
--
Posted: 2007-10-26 22:47:59
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-26 21:09:19, Dextrr wrote:
Key word: 'fiddle'. So basically what you saying, N95 beats the crap out of the K850 in 'AUTO" settings. I thought so too, thanks buds! lollz
No, what I am saying is that in bright sunlight N95 does a better job with auto in many situations while in dull light it appears to be the opposite. That's why there are manual settings, to fix what the auto can not deal with.
n95's biggest problem is that many times it appears to loose details (look at the trees in get picture below) and look more like a painting rather than a picture (the white balance and exposer however looks ok).
If that is you perception of a good "picture", well what can I say. Each on is own.
http://publish.it168.com/shou[....]0070924023809&picid=653134.jpg
On 2007-10-26 21:09:19, Dextrr wrote:
And now ladies and gents, the black beauty, the N95 8gb is going to mop the floor with the competition, specially that fugly brick aka SE's joke of a 'flagship' K850. lollz ;]
Sure, an N95 8G for 1050 USD is a bargain.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-10-26 23:54 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 00:53:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 00:53:09, Arne Anka wrote:
Sure, an N95 8G for 1050 USD is a bargain.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-10-26 23:54 ]
LOL ... right! So paying $650+ JUST for a crappy java and camera phone is a bargain?! Another couple of bills get you the ultimate phone --> N95 8gb, yeah!
Look around this thing called the internet, the N95 8gb goes around $850. tata!
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 01:02:41
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 01:02:41, Dextrr wrote:
Look around this thing called the internet, the N95 8gb goes around $850. tata!
look a little harder and you can find it for $700.
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 01:22:34
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 01:02:41, Dextrr wrote:
LOL ... right! So paying $650+ JUST for a crappy java and camera phone is a bargain?! Another couple of bills get you the ultimate phone --> N95 8gb, yeah!
Without another a couple of bills you can buy a decent laptop for the price of an N95 8G and that is more useful than an N95, yeah !
On 2007-10-27 01:02:41, Dextrr wrote:
Look around this thing called the internet, the N95 8gb goes around $850. tata!
Look around your self, you can find a K850 for around 580 USD. Beside, you seem to forget your local VAT and the shipping cost. With that N95 becomes 850 USD*1.25 (25% VAT at my location) = 1065 USD and that's without the cost for the shipment. Tata on your self.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-10-27 12:12 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 01:23:57
Edit :
Quote
Actually, I've seen a picture of K800, K850 and N95 next to each other with their screens turned on.
God, I was amazed that K850's screen had more vivid colours and was twice as bright as N95's. Really, I, too, thought that N95's screen cannot be beaten (from what I've heard), but now I know for real which one's better.
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 01:41:27
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 01:41:27, NightBlade wrote:
Actually, I've seen a picture of K800, K850 and N95 next to each other with their screens turned on.
God, I was amazed that K850's screen had more vivid colours and was twice as bright as N95's. Really, I, too, thought that N95's screen cannot be beaten (from what I've heard), but now I know for real which one's better.
Only if you set the K850 to max brightness and N95 to default medium (or when the light sensor is active). According to this
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=11607 , it is more like:
From several angles the screen looks decent, however it does not have the brightness of the N95 display due to the 16M colors of the Nokia family member.
No matter what, the 2.2inch screen size of the so-called flagship K850 sure sucks big time compare to the glorious 2.6in of N95 or 2.8in of N95 8gb.
@dragoneye
4 secs to start, 5 secs to save or 3 sec to open if in background and 5 secs to save on the new n95-3 (us version with the 128 ram).. (you can't even leave the camera in the old n95 running cause you'll get memory errors...)
My N95 only took 2 sec (and not 5 sec) to save a picture - with the preview mode turn off
.
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 03:31:21
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 03:31:21, mib1800 wrote:
My N95 only took 2 sec (and not 5 sec) to save a picture - with the preview mode turn off
.
i'll have to try that...love the new n95 with the ram... just can't get anything useful out of the cam unless i want to do landscape/scenary shots....
just tried it... maybe 1 sec faster... not enough IMO... i'm saving it to a 4 gig card... n95... just does it slow.. even the allaboutsymbian guys agree....
_________________
Shaolinmonk on HOFO Official PHONE JUNKIE
My P1i Review
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152437&start=0[ This Message was edited by: DragonEye on 2007-10-27 04:22 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 05:10:09
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 03:31:21, mib1800 wrote:
From several angles the screen looks decent, however it does not have the brightness of the N95 display due to the 16M colors of the Nokia family member.
No matter what, the 2.2inch screen size of the so-called flagship K850 sure sucks big time compare to the glorious 2.6in of N95 or 2.8in of N95 8gb.
Black levels on K850 are better, . N95 because of the transflective layer, becomes washed out when showing blacks.
No matter what, the 2.2inch screen size of the so-called flagship K850 sure sucks big time compare to the glorious 2.6in of N95 or 2.8in of N95 8gb.
both have QVGA resolution, K850 has the edge when it comes to pixels per cm(because it has higher pixels per inch) which has less pixelation compared to n95's lower pixel per cm rate. in other words images when viewed in K850 looks finer and sharper compared to N95. and you call N95's screen glorious because of the larger dimensions and larger pixels
_________________
"Whatever you do today determines what you will be in future, nothing is difficult if you do your part"
know drawing? tell us here
[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2007-10-27 05:03 ]
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 06:00:37
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-10-27 06:00:37, razec wrote:
both have QVGA resolution, K850 has the edge when it comes to pixels per cm(because it has higher pixels per inch) which has less pixelation compared to n95's lower pixel per cm rate. in other words images when viewed in K850 looks finer and sharper compared to N95. and you call N95's screen glorious because of the larger dimensions and larger pixels
Same old argument that has been beaten to death many times over. Well, enjoy yourself with K850 its teeny-weeny screen
--
Posted: 2007-10-27 06:15:03
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
