>
New Topic
>
Topic Locked
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> k850 + photoshop from plankgatan
Bookmark topic
@gunsroses...because of 2 things.
1.
its soooo boring to play around with imageshack to show some pics in full size..it takes time, and its boring..i just want to show some pictures...I DONT CARE IF SOMEONE WANT TO SE MY PICS IN FULL SIZE OR NOT...
2.
Esato shrink them automaticly to 800 x 600..(did you know that ????
I mean for when you say that the pics are great and are sharp which they are (resized) it just seems a little misleading. I just think you are only showing a few fullsize because the others would look terrible full size.
I knew that it resizes pics automatically, and i dont think ur editing them on resizing, but whats the point of resizing them if the forum does anyway?
[ This Message was edited by: gunsnroses on 2007-12-18 07:49 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 08:40:33
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-18 03:59:15, Bhavv wrote:
This thread and its OP fail, plankgatan wins again. Better luck next time k850i haters, why cant you just leave here and go to a nokia forum instead? Posts and threads like this one make me sick, and thats before I had to read the discussion on child porn.
Sorry you feel this is another thread about Nokia users - but its NOT! Its time YOU grow up and realize that not everybody here is a zit popping pupil in junior high. Some of us have careers & lov ethe use and features in our Mobile phones. Any there are some JUST a handful here that are parents and have children of our own and are CONCERNED for the safety and welfare of other children! That said I agree that it takes this thread OFF topic and will no longer discuss my concern for a fellow parent (not to offend Plankgatan in any way shape or form). we were NOT talking about child pron but the possibility of theft of photos, and many of us here have seen Plankgatan's daughter in so many of his posts - of whom is adorable. You can ALSO see photos taken by the K850i as a work of art.
BACK ON TOPIC:
We are now in the possibility that works of photographic art! And posting here without a watermark means that ANYONE can copy and get credit even FUNDS $$$ for your hard work.
I think it would be GREAT if Esato attached a watermark to the poster (including his/her name by default when attaching a photo). This would be awesome.
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 09:15:16
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-18 09:15:16, Prom1 wrote:
On 2007-12-18 03:59:15, Bhavv wrote:
This thread and its OP fail, plankgatan wins again. Better luck next time k850i haters, why cant you just leave here and go to a nokia forum instead? Posts and threads like this one make me sick, and thats before I had to read the discussion on child porn.
Sorry you feel this is another thread about Nokia users - but its NOT! Its time YOU grow up and realize that not everybody here is a zit popping pupil in junior high. Some of us have careers & lov ethe use and features in our Mobile phones. Any there are some JUST a handful here that are parents and have children of our own and are CONCERNED for the safety and welfare of other children! That said I agree that it takes this thread OFF topic and will no longer discuss my concern for a fellow parent (not to offend Plankgatan in any way shape or form). we were NOT talking about child pron but the possibility of theft of photos, and many of us here have seen Plankgatan's daughter in so many of his posts - of whom is adorable. You can ALSO see photos taken by the K850i as a work of art.
BACK ON TOPIC:
We are now in the possibility that works of photographic art! And posting here without a watermark means that ANYONE can copy and get credit even FUNDS $$$ for your hard work.
I think it would be GREAT if Esato attached a watermark to the poster (including his/her name by default when attaching a photo). This would be awesome.
Back on Topic?
Since when is watermarks on pictures relevant to this threads topic.
This threads topic is about attacking a members credibility and I'd rather we didn't do that either as it demeans the whole forum. This whole thread is immature so if you wish to add to it, hiding behind the excuse of being a concerned parent, its your credibility and reputation at stake!
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 21:39:06
Edit :
Quote
lmao, reading this is making me laugh so much!!
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 21:44:52
Edit :
Quote
I think it bothers some people that someone makes good pictures with the K850i because they do not like the phone.
some want to do good pictures without settings.
take a look on this topic
http://www.planete-nokia.com/[....]=437770&st=15255&#entry437770"
There's a lot of pictures taken with the K850i and also Nokia N95, N82, K800i, W910i ect...
[ This Message was edited by: davidsic on 2007-12-18 21:19 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 22:16:50
Edit :
Quote
time to close this topic??? going no where..
--
Posted: 2007-12-18 23:08:02
Edit :
Quote
Oddly enough the thread starter is nowhere to be found?
--
Posted: 2007-12-19 01:20:24
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-18 21:39:06, carkitter wrote:
Back on Topic?
Since when is watermarks on pictures relevant to this threads topic.
This threads topic is about attacking a members credibility and I'd rather we didn't do that either as it demeans the whole forum. This whole thread is immature so if you wish to add to it, hiding behind the excuse of being a concerned parent, its your credibility and reputation at stake!
The thread was talking about EDITING photos. Ever wonder how Esato is able to tell WHICH phone you posted from ?!
Think about the suggestions offered carefully before you just click on reply next time. Watermarking is relevant because then EACH poster would NOT have to make a stupid thread to defend the legitamacy of his photo's purity. Does Esato NOT read the photo's EXIF data to find out if it came from the specified phone model?
In any event I'm sure there are other technics to fool others even using photoshop that the average person cannot argue for or against legitimacy.
--
Posted: 2007-12-19 02:13:34
Edit :
Quote
On 2007-12-19 02:13:34, Prom1 wrote:
...Watermarking is relevant because then EACH poster would NOT have to make a stupid thread to defend the legitamacy of his photo's...
So we agree this is a stupid thread. However it was not made by a member to
defend legitamacy.......... it was made by an inexperienced member to
attack legitamacy.
--
Posted: 2007-12-19 08:05:08
Edit :
Quote
he he he....bondtölpen who started this thread havnt said anything more then his first post.......wondering why ????? (i dont care if some redneck want to say something about myself (be my guest), but he should at least have all fact clear BEFORE he do it)
_________________
I
K850,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-12-19 10:16 ]
--
Posted: 2007-12-19 09:43:49
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Topic Locked
