>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> no 16M yet? its 2008!
Bookmark topic
On 2008-02-12 08:04:39, Amras wrote:
@tonchy
Pls don't get me wrong.
Actually, the post I made was for them who said Nokia's display is better because they are 16M colors. The truth is, they are not even better at all than SE's - even when they are 16M colors and SE is 'just' 256k colors.
So my point will be.. 16M color screen doesn't guarantee anything. The quality itselff will depend on the manufacturer itself.
But of course, I also agree with you, if SE put some 16M color screen on its display, of course without any doubt it will be better than SE's 256k color screens.. and most of all, it will be the ultimatum since SE's display is always one of the best.
I also expect one or two from SE, of course.
_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...
[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-02-12 07:08 ]
hi amras, that's what i thought too, look at my post above, IMO,
could easily replace their numbers in spec for 262k into 16M with ease, no hardware mod
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 08:30:30
Edit :
Quote
^^^^ Agreed. But it is still something I do not consider as my purchase factor. I haven't even been thinking about it until I saw this thread. My opinion is still exactly the same as it was before I have read all the posts. Quality of screen visual expression is what counts.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 08:32:14
Edit :
Quote
@Amras:
very nice! i do hope those nasty 16M-on-SE yearners would now shut up!
i love S500's display, the quality is superb!
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:01:55
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-12 08:32:14, kenoby wrote:
^^^^ Agreed. But it is still something I do not consider as my purchase factor. I haven't even been thinking about it until I saw this thread. My opinion is still exactly the same as it was before I have read all the posts. Quality of screen visual expression is what counts.
once again things change: color depth become more important as size and resolution increase. X1 has a supperb size and resolution yet it apparently lacked the hardware power to pull a 24 bit screen
@jakontil and amras
i definately agree with you
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:06:45
Edit :
Quote
once again things change: color depth become more important as size and resolution increase. X1 has a supperb size and resolution yet it apparently lacked the hardware power to pull a 24 bit screen
As stated millions of times - it lacks the software power to do so.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:09:32
Edit :
Quote
I doubt your statements. Well, let us see when we will have opinions from the first hand user experience. I think it is just development of equipment itself what counts.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:17:01
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
On 2008-02-12 07:22:44, tonchy wrote:
On 2008-02-12 07:08:21, Muhummad-Oli wrote:
Windows mobile ONLY SUPPORTS 65k.
don't just make statements If you are going to post something at least READ the thread first
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=164777&start=15
WinMo supports up to 32 bit depth displays (4K+ Million colors or 4+Billion colors if you are american
)
[ This Message was edited by: tonchy on 2008-02-12 06:24 ]
My apologies, I missed a couple of posts. And thats what a lot of obviously mis-informed people have been saying in the X1 thread, etc. So I naturally thought this to be the truth. Sorry mate, I should've read more carefully.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:20:50
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.
they started with it already 2 years ago...
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:22:23
Edit :
Quote
why is everybody is complaining about the X1 65k color screen.....
did you ever see 65k color on a (((((((WVGA - 800x480 3inch))))))) display????
you will never notice color banding in that pixel-density.... never!!!
i like to save the processor power to do more things than to show 16M colors on the screen like that that makes no difference...
so stop about color-depth complaining...!!!!!!!
EDIT: you'r right kenoby.. maybe i've been alittle bit aggressive.
sorry
[ This Message was edited by: chombos1 on 2008-02-12 08:35 ]
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:24:53
Edit :
Quote
Ease up. Not everyone is complaining. You do need to work on your approach. Seems to me lately around here some strange aggressiveness is ruling the posts.
--
Posted: 2008-02-12 09:30:26
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
