>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
Other manufacturers
> 8 new Samsung phones
Bookmark topic
What the hell is going on??? This is not the thread topic... I have said enough of my opinion on SE's designs being the most different and new than other companies...
Just a simple request to all, please seperate design and looks... That way maybe you will agree that SE phones look different but still having the similar design base... OK????
Now no more of this on this thread...
Any better/HQ live pics of these new Samsung phones???
--
Posted: 2008-03-12 18:44:54
Edit :
Quote
@QVGA
You seem to be just like SE... Still struck to QVGA???
WVGA???
[ This Message was edited by: hgautam on 2008-03-12 17:49 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-12 18:48:41
Edit :
Quote
"Mini size, big pleasure", hmm sounds like my slogan
--
Posted: 2008-03-12 21:11:26
Edit :
Quote
btw...nokia n90 and n93 are totally a mirror image of each other...they r nothing but bricks and one would rather carry a canon mini-dv which along with an se phone will feel more compact..
the newly announced phones are either a direct copy or an 80% copy of the previous phone...the only design tht has been left alone by nokia is the n91..nt tht they had any choice
--
Posted: 2008-03-12 21:47:11
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Ok all manufacturers (not just phones even) must keep certain things going in their designs because it creates a brand image, and is instantly recognisable to people. There is a slow evolution through the range so that people don't go "what the heck is that?" everytime a new one is released. Also, it advertises the brand. If you see someone using a cool phone and you want one, you should know the brand straight away and be able to go buy one!
Thats why you see an SE and know it's an SE, same with Nokia, Motorola, and Samsung. They all do it. Some people won't like a certain brand image, some people will, it's all down to the personal taste and choice.
I think Motorola did this a little too much though. They need to evolve a little more with each release.
--
Posted: 2008-03-13 05:01:03
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-12 21:47:11, se_dude wrote:
btw...nokia n90 and n93 are totally a mirror image of each other...they r nothing but bricks and one would rather carry a canon mini-dv which along with an se phone will feel more compact..
what does looking like a brick has anything to do with looking different? if your tiny weak hands cant hold 180g of weight, then its clear who's at fault here. and talking about ugly looking bricks, ever seen a W900?
--
Posted: 2008-03-13 14:03:40
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-13 14:03:40, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-03-12 21:47:11, se_dude wrote:
btw...nokia n90 and n93 are totally a mirror image of each other...they r nothing but bricks and one would rather carry a canon mini-dv which along with an se phone will feel more compact..
what does looking like a brick has anything to do with looking different? if your tiny weak hands cant hold 180g of weight, then its clear who's at fault here. and talking about ugly looking bricks, ever seen a W900?
why don't you admit that n93 is far too big and heavy? Who wants to carry such a heavy phone with one self, and when i say heavy, its not that i can't hold it, its just compared to other phones
--
Posted: 2008-03-13 16:13:04
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-13 16:13:04, k850 successor wrote:
On 2008-03-13 14:03:40, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-03-12 21:47:11, se_dude wrote:
btw...nokia n90 and n93 are totally a mirror image of each other...they r nothing but bricks and one would rather carry a canon mini-dv which along with an se phone will feel more compact..
what does looking like a brick has anything to do with looking different? if your tiny weak hands cant hold 180g of weight, then its clear who's at fault here. and talking about ugly looking bricks, ever seen a W900?
why don't you admit that n93 is far too big and heavy? Who wants to carry such a heavy phone with one self, and when i say heavy, its not that i can't hold it, its just compared to other phones
why dont you admit that N93's weight is not the point of the discussion, its the fact that its one heck of a unique looking device
--
Posted: 2008-03-13 17:57:51
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-03-13 17:57:51, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-03-13 16:13:04, k850 successor wrote:
On 2008-03-13 14:03:40, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-03-12 21:47:11, se_dude wrote:
btw...nokia n90 and n93 are totally a mirror image of each other...they r nothing but bricks and one would rather carry a canon mini-dv which along with an se phone will feel more compact..
what does looking like a brick has anything to do with looking different? if your tiny weak hands cant hold 180g of weight, then its clear who's at fault here. and talking about ugly looking bricks, ever seen a W900?
why don't you admit that n93 is far too big and heavy? Who wants to carry such a heavy phone with one self, and when i say heavy, its not that i can't hold it, its just compared to other phones
why dont you admit that N93's weight is not the point of the discussion, its the fact that its one heck of a unique looking device
yeah right, nobody said to you that you should discuss n93, and by the way: There is nothing unique about its design, its just like n90
On topic: Nice handsets, but nothing special
[ This Message was edited by: k850 successor on 2008-03-13 18:40 ]
--
Posted: 2008-03-13 19:39:28
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
