>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Sony Ericsson C905 VS Samsung i8510?
Bookmark topic
On 2008-08-04 22:15:57, se_dude wrote:
I really dont find anything different in the pics taken by both the cams. We need to keep them side by side and in a identical conditions to pick a winner.
Same here... I don't see any difference in picture quality yet... These two phones needs to be compared side by side to judge which one takes better photos...
The pics as mobile-review are pathetic and I cannot believe that C905 will perform anywhere near this when it's released... Just look at some samples here:
http://smape.com/en/reviews/s[....]ny_Ericsson_C905_cam-prev.html
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 08:13:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-04 22:07:05, Intrigue wrote:
On 2008-08-04 22:02:00, adnansanni wrote:
Lack of xenon flash is looks to me a huge failor of cybershot brand.
What! C905 has xenon flash.
I was talking about C902. @plankgatan asked what the failure portion of C902 is.
Although xenon flashes is not always important part for many people but it nice to have the option. Nokia 95, 95-8GB, N82 have same camera module but I always prefer N82 for camera quality only for xenon flashes. It is really help to shot a picture in dark area.
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 11:04:37
Edit :
Quote
I just have to try those phones, cos it seems like my olympus camera is worse than those
_________________
Mobile Phone Insurance[ This Message was edited by: darrenphone on 2008-08-05 11:09 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 12:08:44
Edit :
Quote
hahahaha
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 16:15:34
Edit :
Quote
@mode. i dont really know why i said that. (probably just some impulse feeling when i first saw it, and probably before i release how weird C905 look). i still think C905 not have some elegant
design.
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-05 15:22 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 16:21:22
Edit :
Quote
Clearly the Innov8 camera quality are way way better than the C905, in every aspect, colorrendition, whitebalance, compression artefacts, etc. etc.
No fringing, no color hue like on the SE
On top of that a hughely better video recording feature - SE still crawling around with their useless videorecording
Beleive me - the C905 will be just the same stupid failure as my completely useless K850 - and I for one will not buy into another failure like I did with the K850. 1 year old, outdated and still not working right. Incredible how SE can get away with treating old loyal customers like that.
I'll be looking elsewhere for my next phone, thats for sure - might just be I'll go for the Samsung this time.
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 16:39:01
Edit :
Quote
numb.. how in (h@ll) can you declare that ??? when its just some several pics taken by 8510 on internet
this pictures ive seen is all taken in same light - & weather condition. we have to wait until there it comes some more pics with different types of conditions.
edit. found some other pics as well now... yeh, they looks fine. but C905 will look fine to. (BUT WHY IN HELL DOES 8510 NOT HAVE XENON FLASH. does it even have photo flash ????
by 8510... maybe little high saturation. red looks shiny red, (he he.. where have i seen that before)
guess which phone this is ????
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700 k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-05 16:36 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 17:13:43
Edit :
Quote
is deffo an SE ,even in the downscaled picture u can see the grain (noise ,esspecialy color noise ,lower right corner ,on the child's hand).
i would take my guess ,it's a C905
Plank ,admit it ,INNOV8 is the best cam-phone up to date ,no doubts what so ever.
open your eyes ,please :|
_________________
curently owning: J220 ,W810 ,K550 ,G900;
Nokia: N90 ,2610
lost: S700 ,T630
R.I.P.: SE T105, T230, Z200; sold: K800i
[ This Message was edited by: Alex_230 on 2008-08-05 17:47 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 18:45:13
Edit :
Quote
Umm..the babys pic is a macro..So the rright part is blurred and will iobviously hae noise.use ur brains dude.
i dont think its C905. As its plank's pic, i wouold bet on a C902. C905 has great quality. Same or better than innov8. Please check flikr, u will surely find some awesome pics.
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 19:24:54
Edit :
Quote
The kid on the picture is gorgeous
But I don't really care much about re-sized post processed pictures - I can make good edited pictures also - I want to see the full resolution original or nothing. That's the only way you can really consider what the true quality is like.
I've seen full resolution pictures from both the Samsung and the C905 - and comparing these there are no match. The C905 pictures have the same problems as the K850 pictures have. Color noise, color hue, compression artifacts, edge artifacts, wrong white levels.
The Samsungs pictures have none of these problems - they are almost spot on.
--
Posted: 2008-08-05 19:36:44
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
