>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> K800 vs C902 pictures please
Bookmark topic
The backlight is not as bad as they'd photographed it to be. I should know, one of my friends has a C902.
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 10:39:48
Edit :
Quote
imatic,
i'm also having the same prob!!
i owned a K810i previously.. currently finding for a replacement but itz kinda hard coz K810i is a really good camera phone.. got my eye on C902 but i'm still not sure whether the picture quality is as good..
hopefully there will be someone kind enough ;p
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 10:51:23
Edit :
Quote
NightBlade... of course its not. he just found something to complain about..he he.
(everyone who have use or own a C902 knows that the backlight is perfectley normal).
@DeviLLiciouS..........is this good enough
_________________
I
C902,
W810 &
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-22 11:06 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 12:03:09
Edit :
Quote
The k800i can produce good macros aswell
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 14:50:45
Edit :
Quote
well, I don't see any photography area where old K800 can be ashamed by new C902 so it's only your choice. if you have money and you want new phone - buy C902, if you're looking for better camera only - it's not good direction because C902 will not give you nothing new which is worthy to spent money on it
--
Posted: 2008-08-22 15:35:16
Edit :
Quote
thx plankgatan for the photo but can u post some snap shot of k810i as well?? day n night shots..
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 05:19:07
Edit :
Quote
On 2008-08-22 12:03:09, plankgatan wrote:
@DeviLLiciouS..........is this good enough
As far as I am concerned, the C902 may be an upgrade in pixel count compared to K810 but it sure is a downgrade in quality. Look at plankis photos in full size and then compare with a few examples in full size from our Esato friends:
Full size
Full size
Full size
Too bad that the K810 looks like a Bang&Olufsen remote control
Question to those who complain about it being unnecessary to look at full size photos: why then need 3, 5 or 8 MP? Why not stick to VGA or 1 MP camphones?
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-08-23 05:32 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 06:30:08
Edit :
Quote
eehh......... i have both cameras and i feel & see C902 is little better on everything. (sharpness, low light, night, color-reproduction, etc). dont get me wrong. i praise K810 very much, think its a great phone. But A200 and everything who makes C902 awesome, is just awesome
there is NO way you can get the leafs like this with a K810, (i know, ive been taking many K810 macro pics)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-23 08:28 ]
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 07:53:29
Edit :
Quote
what leaf structure of the tomato have to do with camera? every bumpy object is looking great no matter of camera especially when light is hitting object not in front but on one side. even object with subtle bumpy surface can look very nice if light is good, like on this shot by K800
nothing unusual I would say
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 09:47:56
Edit :
Quote
Tomato ? Its no tomato.and like i said i have take hundreds macro with k810 o k800 and i have never get the same result like c902. C902 is just better. You even see that on the picture you post.it dosent have the sharpness.
--
Posted: 2008-08-23 10:34:00
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
