>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> Official SE C903 Cybershot Discussion
Bookmark topic
So that it will not overwrite C905 as the flagship?? I really hate SE for coming up with so many beautifully-designed phones!~ xD
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 17:49:30
Edit :
Quote
SE should give us new MXE-60
I strongly second that! A new flash accessory is a must which has been mysteriously lacking from the
portfolio.
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 18:51:16
Edit :
Quote
I personally think it looks cheap and tacky, judging by the live pictures up a bit. SE phones are no longer exciting like the ones from Samsung and Nokia.
I actually cant be bothered to express how fed up I am of SE, falling market share? No wonder. Wheres the innovation. Latest technology? (8mp) Well where is on a C9xx series. And xenon flashes? The C903, C901 and C510 all look the same, I actually cant tell the difference between the C901 and C510. They are both copies of the K770. SE used to make really innovative and interesting phones. Now they're all the same and IMO boring.
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 18:53:33
Edit :
Quote
I wonder if the whole sliding camera cover lens will end up scratching the body...
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 19:05:57
Edit :
Quote
Great phone&design, but it could be much better, just, if have XENON AND WIFI
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 21:04:14
Edit :
Quote
i like the design but the plastics and chrome look really cheap, really noticeable looking at the back of the black one
--
Posted: 2009-02-10 21:19:34
Edit :
Quote
That blue keypad on the white one looks really really bad, it's WAY too blue, kinda hurts my eyes. SE gotta change that. Also the materials and colors were a pretty bad choice. the appearance will look 20x better if they swapped out the tacky glossy plastic for brushed aluminum. anybody agree?
[ This Message was edited by: driftmania on 2009-02-11 00:48 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 01:38:35
Edit :
Quote
Muhammad-Oli Posts: > 500
Yeah I agree. Brushed aluminium, or at the very least, matte plastic. So many manufacturers are moving away from the glossy plastics now.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Muhammad-Oli on 2009-02-11 01:21 ]
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 01:42:58
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-02-10 17:30:19, Raiderski wrote:
On 2009-02-10 16:19:27, NightBlade wrote:
1. Xenons are expensive. That would increase both the width and the price of the phone. It's meant to be a mid-tier phone.
2. It's meant to be a mid-tier phone.
how then explain xenon in C901? it's also mid-end phone, xenon price is ~10$, hardware size can be real issue but does not C9xx Cyber-shot deserved for xenon? SE should give us new MXE-60
looking at the size of the xenon flash module on c901 it just look too small....it makes me wonder what is the capacitor used in the phone for storing charge for the flash.... or whatever it is really driving the xenon module...sorry i am not expect in all the hardware but really....having a xenon but minus LED torch....then you can do video shot.
I have owned a P1 for many months and I do feel it is either SE have one phone that have both LED (2x) plus xenon....else put LED is enough. Xenon alone don't make it convenient.
and talking about 5mpx....I really don't see a point of having 8mpx.... for C903....as it is a mid tier product....normal user will be someone who don't visit ESATO and post message everyday here...they buy what they feel justify their budget on style and features that is acceptable.
I am not sure what SE marketing research lead them but 2.4in with 5mpx plus a Sony T series look alike back cover do have the ability to draw it.
of course if the material used is able to be same as Sony T series with glossy aluminum or metal...it will be better but due to all the RF issue...it have to be glossy plastic...hopefully soon we see a T700 look a like with matte/ brush aluminum feel.
C903 now resemble the T30 I owned.
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 02:14:26
Edit :
Quote
Now I understand the C903 has no front camera for video conferencing, using only the main camera.
C903a the American version if you have front camera
not that weird?
--
Posted: 2009-02-11 03:03:04
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
