>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
General
> c902 vs Canon Ixus 85is
Bookmark topic
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 16:28:28
Edit :
Quote
Off topic:
On 2009-04-27 00:34:30, blerk wrote:
Off topic:
The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn
That is just too funny
I can't stop laughing
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 16:45:25
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-27 16:28:28, davidtre wrote:
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it
Nope. Besides, RED is not the industry leader.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2009-04-27 16:12 ]
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 17:11:43
Edit :
Quote
What is so funny, yesterday I went out and even when I use the screen to reflect the sun its still very readable, try that with any SE phone. Wonder if you even held a N95 in your hands and tested it.
On 2009-04-27 16:45:25, Idou wrote:
Off topic:
On 2009-04-27 00:34:30, blerk wrote:
Off topic:
The N95 screen is amazing in full sunlight by the way, SE should learn
That is just too funny
I can't stop laughing
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 17:20:47
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-04-27 17:11:43, Mizzle wrote:
On 2009-04-27 16:28:28, davidtre wrote:
Of course your professional equipment sucks big time compared with it
Nope.
Can your equipment shoot with a 28K module (sensor size mm 168 x 56 and 261 megapixel
) at 30 FPS? Nope.
Besides, RED is not the industry leader.
Red Digital Cinema Camera Company was founded in 2005, obviously they can’t be the industry leader.
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 19:26:24
Edit :
Quote
Hey Mizzle why don't you tell what equipment you use then?
--
Posted: 2009-04-27 20:57:15
Edit :
Quote
So why do this comparison. Well i dont really know and i am a little bored today. I saw some comparison earlier that showed that the phone was nearly as good as a digicam but clearly our phones has a long way to go before they compete against a small cheap digicam.
It´s also a thought to all those who are thinking of upgrading to an amazing expensive cameraphone. It could be more worth buying a real digicam instead for those special moments. I bought the Ixus för only 200$ and it seems well worth the money.
c905, innov8, Renoir or any other phone would not stand a chance either. But we should also think of how we use our pics. If we just use them in small size and for web posting and so, the phone cams copes quite well and could be enough for many of us.
[ This Message was edited by: Pitzon on 2009-04-25 17:54 ]
Well the thing is, to my eyes the C902 shots look just as good as the Ixus. Until you actually zoom-in and do a close-up crop of the picture there's not much of a visible difference. Besides taking 5MP C902 shots and resizing them in an image editor will give you free anti-aliasing and improve the image quality quite alot.
--
Posted: 2009-09-11 18:21:09
Edit :
Quote
The c902 is yesterdays news, someone should do 100% c901 crops vs. a small digicam, it's the first cellphone camera that looks decent at 100% zoom, much better then the c905 or c902.
--
Posted: 2009-09-11 18:41:04
Edit :
Quote
The first? I assume you mean SE's first.
--
Posted: 2009-09-11 18:59:18
Edit :
Quote
On 2009-09-11 18:59:18, AbuBasim wrote:
The first? I assume you mean SE's first.
You assume right.
--
Posted: 2009-09-11 22:20:17
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
