Manufacturer Discussion : Apple : Judge: Apple Must Publicly Admit Samsung Didn't Copy The iPad
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Manufacturer Discussion >
Apple
> Judge: Apple Must Publicly Admit Samsung Didn't Copy The iPad
Bookmark topic
I doubt the judge will be happy with it, but i think the Apple lawyers probably spotted a loophole, that OR they are just trying to prolong actually trying to do a proper apology.
--
Posted: 2012-10-26 18:09:54
Edit :
Quote
That is one half assed apology and I don't think the judge will see it as made genuinely.
--
Posted: 2012-10-26 19:33:26
Edit :
Quote
i expect APPLE to to put up ads saying "the TAB doesn't resembles the PAD,coz it isn't cool enough"
--
Posted: 2012-10-26 21:16:14
Edit :
Quote
Yeah it certainly is a pathetic so called apology. In fact, i dont think its an apology. Where do they actually apologise ?
Its all basically legal waffle. Why couldnt Apple for once just hold their hands up and say fair enough, we lost the case, we're sorry for starting all this legal s**t in the first place.
And then the very last paragraph sticks up two fingers to the judge who made the judgement against Apple. The very last sentence closes the entire statement that "
Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad"
So hows that an apology ??? its the exact opposite !!!
Apple are by far the single most dangerous company threatening the entire industry. They seem to think everyone owes them something, they think they're never wrong and even go so far as to flout the law here in my own country and ignore the courts judgments. What an absolute farce. Please, i beg people of sound mind, dont ever buy Apple devices.
Im so enraged by their page i feel like i want to email them to complain.
--
Posted: 2012-10-26 22:00:31
Edit :
Quote
Wanna buy my 4S ???
--
Posted: 2012-10-26 22:23:11
Edit :
Quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18895384
I don't see where the judge has asked for an apology?
"The notice should outline the July 9 London court decision that Samsung’s Galaxy tablets don’t infringe Apple’s registered designs, Judge Colin Birss said yesterday. It should be posted on Apple’s U.K. home page for six months and published in newspapers and magazines to correct any impression the South Korea-based company was copying Apple’s product, Birss said."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news[....]dn-t-copy-ipad-judge-says.html
--
Posted: 2012-10-27 00:53:31
Edit :
Quote
This is good! Apple told to rewrite 'Samsung did not copy' statement, post it on front page until Dec 14th.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/tec[....]nov/01/apple-samsung-statement
--
Posted: 2012-11-01 14:15:42
Edit :
Quote
I'm glad. It's now acting like a big spoilt brat.
--
Posted: 2012-11-01 16:37:49
Edit :
Quote
Here is the newspaper version.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/[....]-acknowledgement-uk-newspapers
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 14:27:26
Edit :
Quote
The newspaper advert is worse than the online one.
It doesnt even give much details about what its about. It barely mentions Apple. To the person not in the know, they wouldnt even probably know what this advertisement is for.
Personally i think they should be forced to make a full page advertisement with pictures of the Galaxy products and their own products with large bold writing indicating there was no infringement. The kind of advert which even the more ignorant Apple owner could understand and maybe, just maybe affect their opinions of the company.
Im glad Apple are getting some major hits in their faces. They deserve it more than any company has ever done for such stupid market tactics.
--
Posted: 2012-11-02 21:42:36
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
