Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : 7250 vs T610
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > 7250 vs T610 Bookmark topic
Page <  123456789>

ppcrockar Posts: > 500

Quote:
On 2003-05-02 20:01, Froddan wrote:
Picture this, you're about to get a new laptop. Now, you have set yourself up on two different ones, it's going to be one of them.
Both are about the same price. The main diff is that one has a 15" 32bit screen, 10GB harddisk and 256MB RAM, the other one has a 14" 24bit screen, 30GB harddisk and 512MB RAM, now which one is it gonna be?


That's not the same thing.. The differnce between 24bit and 32bit isn't noticable. But there is a huge difference between 4096 colours and 65536 colours.

And it's not only the colours, but also the resolution and the screens "speed". There are no "shadows" and other STN problems visible on the T610 while this are very visible on the Nokia 4096 colour screens. I've tested both phones and I can tell you that difference is huge.

Edit:
Quote:
I do believe that Nokia's pc-suite works for transfering photos back and forth between your phone and pc.


Yes, but that is kind of crippled isn't it. You'll have to have the Nokia software installed on every PC that you would like to transfer the picture to. With the T610 you just need a computer with an IR-port or bluetooth (or any other device with bluetooth/IR) and you can transfer the image.

@XsuwailX

Master of on screen quality.. you got to be kidding. My guess is that you have never seen the T610 screen. The T610's screen is far superior to the Nokia 7250 screen. As I said before the difference between 4096 colours and 65536 colours is very large. While 4096 colours might be ok for "comics" and "clipart" images it doesn't stand a chance when it comes to displaying photos.

[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-05-02 20:51 ]
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 21:47:00
Edit : Quote

Froddan Posts: > 500

Since I haven't tested either one of them, I can't argue on that.
What I'd like to know is, if it was Motorola, Samsung, Siemens or Nokia that would be bringing out the T610, wouldn't many of you guys trash it because of the lack of memory?

Yea, sending pics from a 7250 to a pc requires the installation of the pc-suite. But then again, how many desktops have built in IR or BT?
Kinda the same prob.
--
Posted: 2003-05-02 22:02:00
Edit : Quote

XsuwailX Posts: 103

Hehe! Im beginning 2 enjoy this! @rashkae, INAMO! ANG KULIT MO! BOBO KA BA? Compare d on screen quality of a nokia and a T610, you'll see w/c one is better! Dnt use that damn PC! If u dnt agree, meet me anywhere in manila 2 see on the spot! il hit ur head w/ a baseball bat if u stil insist that T610 is beter in terms of ON SCREEN PCTRE QUALTY! seryoso ko, kininginamo! This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 01:35:00
Edit : Quote

randomix Posts: 122

Quote:
But then again, how many desktops have built in IR or BT?
Kinda the same prob.


But most of the NoteBooks have built in IR and some of them with BT
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 03:54:00
Edit : Quote

ppcrockar Posts: > 500

@ XsuwailX

If you compare the on-screen picture quality of the T610 and the Nokia 7250, and you insist that the Nokia has better quality, then you need to have your eyes checked or something.

@ randomix

Exactly.. almost all notebooks has IR (and some have bluetooth). Also some new motherboards for desktop PC's has built-in bluetooth. It's more likely that you'll find a computer with an IR port than a computer with the Nokia Software on it. Besides we are not just talking about computers. Look at all thoose PDA's that have IR-ports and other phones with IR-ports.

Why have Nokia crippled the phone by not letting people send images from the phone to another IR device. I mean if you have an IR-port with minimize its usefullness.

[ This Message was edited by: ppcrockar on 2003-05-03 09:31 ]
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 10:26:00
Edit : Quote

kadafi Posts: 48

Don't forget that the 7250 has the most crappiest camera ever..The quality is the worst I have seen on these type of phones...
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 13:40:00
Edit : Quote

XsuwailX Posts: 103

ppcrockar... PWEEE!!! Btw, i have a surprise for u! Juz u wait when i log in using a PC! HEHEHE! This message was posted from a T68i
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 16:51:00
Edit : Quote

Froddan Posts: > 500

I agree, it's stupid of Nokia to have crippled IR. Especially since both IR and BT worked perfect on my old 7650, actually better than on my P800.

But still, the average user has a desktop without IR or BT, and then the odds are equal between T610 and 7250. You need SW installed on your pc to get pic transfers running.
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 17:15:00
Edit : Quote

ac Posts: 316

I had always been a Nokia user until I got to use a T68i. Ever since then, I feel that SE makes phones that are far superior to Nokia but Nokia's phones are somewhat more user friendly. For example, consider the SMS function on the T68i.

However, I'm whole heartedly in favour of the T610 even with its 2mb memory. The 7250 looks like an entry level phone when compared to the T610.
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 17:37:00
Edit : Quote

maddav Posts: 356

@ac - same here, about the T68i, i can't wait for the T610!
--
Posted: 2003-05-03 17:45:00
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456789>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home