>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
Sony Ericsson / Sony >
Accessories
> why does my logitech mx700 suck
Bookmark topic
aahh thats great news
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 00:53:44
Edit :
Quote
Seartch for TerraTec Mystify Razer BoomSlang 2100
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 01:02:03
Edit :
Quote
@Ne0
A
standard corded mouse has a dpi of 400-800 (USB). Once again, you fail to make your point. The corded mouse you use as your example costs £60 , and is not ment for everyday user. It's obviously made for gaming, and 1200dpi is pretty much expected from a corded mouse that costs that much, so why are you using it as an example?! I am sure if I look hard enough, I'll find a mouse with even higher dpi from a professional line of products.
So once again. MX-700 is the best mouse I have ever used. Logitech beats Microsoft any time... and MX-700 beats
most corded mice (in it's class) any time.
Here is a review, if you are interested
_________________
If I had all the answers, I wouldn't have any questions.
Answers to the most common questions on Esato forums[ This Message was edited by: wrath000 on 2003-10-07 10:37 ]
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 09:30:04
Edit :
Quote
How many images per sec does the MX700 read?
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 11:27:00
Edit :
Quote
A qoute from
www.tweak3d.net
Image Processing Power
The MX Optical Engine captures 4.7 megapixels of information per second, more than 60% more than other leading mice. Why is that significant? Because when more image data is captured and analyzed each second, more data is available to determine motion... increasing the mouse's ability to track on difficult surfaces or during quick movements.
A qoute from
Tom's Hardware
30x30 gives us a sensor of 900 pixels. So we now divide the 4.7 Mpixels by 900 and arrive at a speed of 5222 images per second.
_________________
If I had all the answers, I wouldn't have any questions.
Answers to the most common questions on Esato forums[ This Message was edited by: wrath000 on 2003-10-07 10:45 ]
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 11:37:53
Edit :
Quote
The newest intellieye witch is in Explorer 3.0 and Wireless explorer is 6mp
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 11:46:01
Edit :
Quote
It's not 6 megapixels per second. It's 6000(~3 megapixels with their sensor size) samples per second (as compared to logitech ~5200). This is due to the smaller sensor Microsoft use in their mice. The reviews of the Microsoft Wireless Explorer state that the mouse lacks in precision...
_________________
If I had all the answers, I wouldn't have any questions.
Answers to the most common questions on Esato forums[ This Message was edited by: wrath000 on 2003-10-07 11:09 ]
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 12:04:13
Edit :
Quote
As i said earlier, yes the wireless explorer suck...but the 3.0 is completely different
This message was posted from a T610
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 12:30:54
Edit :
Quote
[ This Message was edited by: Prostata on 2003-10-07 15:30 ]
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 14:25:43
Edit :
Quote
i dont care whitch one of microsoft or logitech is best, but why is my old microsoft mouse (one of the first optical) better the mx700? some thing must be fuc*ed up.
--
Posted: 2003-10-07 22:17:31
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
