Esato Mobile
Sony Ericsson / Sony : General : SE S700 vs Samsung SGH- D500
> New Topic
> Reply
< Esato Forum Index > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > SE S700 vs Samsung SGH- D500 Bookmark topic
Page <  123456789>

Bucky Posts: 29

Quote:
On 2005-01-12 15:14:43, JonnySax wrote:
it doesnt seem to have mp3 capability like the d500, nor does it look that nice. I suppose style is not a sony ericsson strongpoint though eh. All I will say is I have no complains with the d500.


OMG, u dun even know that the S700i can play mp3 and u are trying to compare both phones!!! Please do some homework before u start posting. S700i is a multimedia phone.
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 16:52:28
Edit : Quote

vanquish Posts: > 500

d500 for me
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 16:56:55
Edit : Quote

whizkidd Posts: > 500

Everyone has his/her own likes and dislikes. I have to say the D500 is a good product from the samsung stable. This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 16:57:34
Edit : Quote

k4m!k4ze Posts: > 500

i like the d500 too, i dont like the swing style of the s700, tough to use for essemessers like me
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:02:20
Edit : Quote

dave_uk Posts: > 500

The D500 is a very nice phone, but to the person attempting to baffle all with terminology and ignore the actual facts of the matter, the BT is at least somewhat crippled, in that it does not support the BIP (Bluetooth Imaging Profile), and will therefore not allow printing of stored images to a BT printer. Not the biggest deal, but the lack of expansion slot for removable memory does make it rather unnecessarily complicated to actually get a physical copy of the images taken with the very nice 1.3MP camera!
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:06:03
Edit : Quote

JonnySax Posts: 7

yes the d500 is a tough act to follow!

the photos I have taken on the d500 have been of excellent quality, so I cant really fathom out why you judge that the sony ericsson has higher quality? on which basis do you make this judgement?

I wholeheartedly agree that to be quibbling over what is better is very childish. I reckon that both these phones are of high quality, but I personally like a stylish phone, that doesnt rotate! never seen such a stupid mechanism.

and as for cost, why dont you just go for a contract then it wont cost you anything, or dont you actually use your phone to make phone calls or for sms?

maybe if you stayed in a quality country like the UK then you would appreciate more!
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:12:44
Edit : Quote

Bucky Posts: 29

If u read reviews from mobile review and other users forum who have use both S700i and D500, you will noe that they agree that the S700i have a better camera. I am not saying tt the pic taken from D500 is lousy. Bt juz tt they prefer the S700i more.
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:18:24
Edit : Quote

JonnySax Posts: 7

crippled and unnecessarily complicated my ass!!
dont you have a pc??

--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:19:04
Edit : Quote

JonnySax Posts: 7

I can only reason that their photos are lousy because they didnt use it properly or just cant take a decent picture anyway, most women are crap at taking pictures I find.
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:22:20
Edit : Quote

whizkidd Posts: > 500

What are you trying to imply by saying 'quality country like uk'? If you like the D500 more than the S700. Its good. But does that make the S700 a bad phone? Stop being childish. This message was posted from a T230
--
Posted: 2005-01-12 17:38:05
Edit : Quote
Page <  123456789>

New Topic   Reply
Forum Index

Esato home