General discussions : General : School Kids and MMS Sex.
>
New Topic
>
Reply<
Esato Forum Index
>
General discussions >
General
> School Kids and MMS Sex.
Bookmark topic
Quote:
On 2004-11-30 14:35:22, semo wrote:
What's wrong with a sexual MMS?
Is it worse than showing killing and chopping of flesh in 'normal' movies?
Just turn on your TV for 5 minutes and scan the channels - you'll see a detailed murder for sure.
And violent computer games... everyone plays them, but no school is concerned about it.
And when we see another mass murder in a school it is of course because of sexual MMS...
I think the world is going in a very wrong direction with it's fake moral values.
This is exactly my point. Nowadays if a movie has bloodbathing scenes it's categorised as 13+, and if there are some sexual scenes 18+.
Now I'm asking myself does that imply that 13 year olds should be (as by public law declares) aware of existance of murders, violence etc. BUT NOT OF SEX?!!
And does that mean it's worse to have sex than to kill a man?
--
Posted: 2004-12-02 23:03:49
Edit :
Quote
it seems to be a topic many parents are embarrassed to talk about and too lazy to try. raising children now seems to be a responsibility of the government, media, schools, etc. basically anyone but the parents.
remember school shootings? marilyn manson was blamed, not shitty parenting.
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 03:31:00
Edit :
Quote
Only the any should've been expelled as he took candid shots without her knowledge. It's just like the american pie movie!
This message was posted from a WAP device
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 04:10:18
Edit :
Quote
That's another thing I find F***** up with out 'morals'. Why is it ok to kill and not have sex?
Why is it ok to show kids mass murders... destruction... mayhem... senseless violence... but it isn't ok for them to see a naked human... or even worse... Ooooo... naked people having sex!!! THE HORROR!!!
But a man's head being blown off by a shotgun is fine. A man eating another man's brains is fine. A machine gun tearing through 1,000 people is fine.
When did it become better to make war and not love?
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 06:42:34
Edit :
Quote
Surley it would be wrong to start banning mobiles because
a boy films a girl using a mobile, it's wrong but it's the easy way out blaming mobilephones for it.
These things have happened long before mobilephones was equiped with cameras ..videocameras has existed a long time, you can also go out and buy a 'teddycam' (build in camera in teddybear with alot better quality then a mobile)
theres lots of possibilitys to do stupid things like this.
Banning/blaming mobilephones for these kinda acts are going the wrong way about solving the problem.
And to take things futher....I have a hard time beliving the kids would't have had sex if they didn't have a mobile...hey newsflash kids have had sex alot longer then mobiles existed.
As a sidenote about technology.
Not only technology invented in the purpose of good is
being used for bad things.
Alot of our really good technologys was initially made
for bad things (war) and then evolved to civil purposes.
But parents and school often wants to find the easy way
out..meaning blame some technology like internet or mobilephones instead of taking responsaility them self
and really think of what they can do to make a diffrence.
A good example is when parents managed to ban the cartoon darkwing duck from swedish television because
a boy in school kicked another boy and managed to brake his leg. The mother blamed darkwing... noone meantioned that perhaps it was her and the fathers responsability not to use the TV as babysitter and let
their children watch whatever.
The news shows alot more violence in the middle of the day...so should be ban that to.
It's sick the lengt ppl go not to take responsability for their life and their childerens actions...it's so much easier to find something like technology to blame.
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 09:11:18
Edit :
Quote
I just wonder when it´s going to start in US to file lawsuits against film producers and even musicians for seducing their children to whatever..
They´re already playing wrestling (as most of all people did like cowboys and Indians or something like this), what will be when more children explore the fun of playing roadrunner and coyote? Or any else cartoons? Tom and Jerry?
But I´m misguiding the thread..
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 11:05:00
Edit :
Quote
guys a lot of the whole sex vs. violence thing started with the church
sex was condemned as 'original sin' but violence was only a product of original sin and its also supposedly an 'instrument of god' at times, too
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 11:30:00
Edit :
Quote
I guess sex & crime went along long before any chruch or even religion was founded..
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 11:33:49
Edit :
Quote
no actually a lot of ancient religions and cultures were very open about sex and it wasnt considered a vice at all
for example the greeks didn't see sex the way we did--not only was sex widely accepted throughout their society but a lot of things we term deviant behavior were just regular parts of life
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 11:40:00
Edit :
Quote
SEX is not a SIN, nor a vice (I guess) . . . it is a NATURAL thing, just like when you are EATING FOOD in order to SURVIVE
! It is PART and PARCEL of Human Evolution . . .
Unless, you are doing it with a - Dog, Cat, Cow, Pig etc. !
--
Posted: 2004-12-03 14:13:39
Edit :
Quote
New Topic
Reply
